Suppr超能文献

PI-RADS 版本 2.1 评分系统在检测移行区前列腺癌方面更具优势:一项诊断研究。

PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer: a diagnostic study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Department of Radiology, Huaian Hospital of Huaian City, Huaian, China.

出版信息

Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Dec;45(12):4142-4149. doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02724-y. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The studies comparing the versions 2 vs. 2.1 of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) are rare. This study aimed to evaluate whether PI-RADS version 2.1 is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer in comparison with PI-RADS version 2.

METHODS

This was a diagnostic study of patients with prostate diseases who visited the Urology Department of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination between 03-01-2016 and 10-31-2018. The images originally analyzed using PI-RADS version 2 were retrospectively re-analyzed and scored in 2019 according to the updated PI-RADS version 2.1. The kappa and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used.

RESULTS

For Reader 1, compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had higher sensitivity (85% vs. 79%, P = 0.03), lower specificity (65% vs. 83%, P < 0.001), and lower area under the curve (AUC) (0.749 vs. 0.809, P < 0.001). For Reader 2 (first attempt), compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had lower specificity (67% vs. 91%, P < 0.001) and lower AUC (0.702 vs. 0.844, P < 0.001). For Reader 2 (second attempt), compared with PI-RADS version 2, version 2.1 had higher sensitivity (88% vs. 78%, P < 0.001) and lower specificity (77% vs. 91%, P < 0.001). The kappa between the two attempts for Reader 2 was 0.321.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that PI-RADS version 2.1 might improve the detection of prostate cancers in the transition zone compared with PI-RADS version 2 but that it might results in higher numbers of biopsies because of lower specificity.

摘要

目的

比较前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)版本 2 与 2.1 的研究很少。本研究旨在评估 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 是否优于 PI-RADS 版本 2,在检测移行区前列腺癌方面更具优势。

方法

这是一项对 2016 年 3 月 1 日至 2018 年 10 月 31 日期间在苏州大学附属第二医院泌尿科就诊并接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的前列腺疾病患者进行的诊断研究。对最初使用 PI-RADS 版本 2 分析的图像进行回顾性重新分析,并于 2019 年根据更新的 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 进行重新评分。使用kappa 和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。

结果

对于读者 1,与 PI-RADS 版本 2 相比,PI-RADS 版本 2.1 具有更高的灵敏度(85%比 79%,P=0.03),更低的特异性(65%比 83%,P<0.001)和更低的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.749 比 0.809,P<0.001)。对于读者 2(首次尝试),与 PI-RADS 版本 2 相比,PI-RADS 版本 2.1 的特异性较低(67%比 91%,P<0.001)和 AUC 较低(0.702 比 0.844,P<0.001)。对于读者 2(第二次尝试),与 PI-RADS 版本 2 相比,PI-RADS 版本 2.1 的灵敏度较高(88%比 78%,P<0.001),特异性较低(77%比 91%,P<0.001)。读者 2 两次尝试之间的 kappa 值为 0.321。

结论

这些结果表明,PI-RADS 版本 2.1 可能比 PI-RADS 版本 2 更能提高移行区前列腺癌的检出率,但特异性较低可能导致活检数量增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验