Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, USA.
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):385-396. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.035. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 analysis system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) detection of prostate cancer (PCa) is based on PI-RADS v1, accumulated scientific evidence, and expert consensus opinion.
To summarize the accuracy, strengths and weaknesses of PI-RADS v2, discuss pathway implications of its use and outline opportunities for improvements and future developments.
For this consensus expert opinion from the PI-RADS steering committee, clinical studies, systematic reviews, and professional guidelines for mpMRI PCa detection were evaluated. We focused on the performance characteristics of PI-RADS v2, comparing data to systems based on clinicoradiologic Likert scales and non-PI-RADS v2 imaging only. Evidence selections were based on high-quality, prospective, histologically verified data, with minimal patient selection and verifications biases.
It has been shown that the test performance of PI-RADS v2 in research and clinical practice retains higher accuracy over systematic transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsies for PCa diagnosis. PI-RADS v2 fails to detect all cancers but does detect the majority of tumors capable of causing patient harm, which should not be missed. Test performance depends on the definition and prevalence of clinically significant disease. Good performance can be attained in practice when the quality of the diagnostic process can be assured, together with joint working of robustly trained radiologists and urologists, conducting biopsy procedures within multidisciplinary teams.
It has been shown that the test performance of PI-RADS v2 in research and clinical practice is improved, retaining higher accuracy over systematic TRUS biopsies for PCa diagnosis.
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-directed biopsies using the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System improves the detection of prostate cancers likely to cause harm, and at the same time decreases the detection of disease that does not lead to harms if left untreated. The keys to success are high-quality imaging, reporting, and biopsies by radiologists and urologists working together in multidisciplinary teams.
前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版分析系统用于多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检测前列腺癌(PCa),基于 PI-RADS 第 1 版、累积的科学证据和专家共识意见。
总结 PI-RADS v2 的准确性、优缺点,讨论其使用的途径意义,并概述改进和未来发展的机会。
对于 PI-RADS 指导委员会的这项共识专家意见、临床研究、系统评价以及用于 mpMRI PCa 检测的专业指南,我们进行了评估。我们专注于 PI-RADS v2 的性能特征,将数据与基于临床影像学 Likert 量表和非 PI-RADS v2 成像的系统进行比较。证据选择基于高质量、前瞻性、经组织学验证的数据,最小化患者选择和验证偏倚。
已经表明,PI-RADS v2 在研究和临床实践中的测试性能在前列腺癌诊断方面保留了比系统经直肠超声(TRUS)活检更高的准确性。PI-RADS v2 未能检测到所有癌症,但确实检测到了大多数可能导致患者伤害的肿瘤,这些肿瘤不应被遗漏。测试性能取决于临床显著疾病的定义和流行率。当可以保证诊断过程的质量,并结合经过严格培训的放射科医生和泌尿科医生共同工作,在多学科团队中进行活检程序时,在实践中可以获得良好的性能。
已经表明,PI-RADS v2 在研究和临床实践中的测试性能得到了提高,在前列腺癌诊断方面保留了比系统 TRUS 活检更高的准确性。
多参数磁共振成像(MRI)和使用前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)的 MRI 引导活检提高了对可能导致伤害的前列腺癌的检测能力,同时减少了对未经治疗不会导致伤害的疾病的检测。成功的关键是放射科医生和泌尿科医生共同工作,在多学科团队中进行高质量的成像、报告和活检。