Ortizo Ronald Dungca, Jalali Farid, Thieu Daniel, Yu Allen, Bucayu Robert, Paiji Christopher, Fortinsky Kyle, Chang Kenneth, Lee John Gunn, Samarasena Jason Buddika
H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Sep;8(9):E1156-E1160. doi: 10.1055/a-1178-0185. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been designed as proprietary stents for the management of pseudocysts (PC)/walled off necrosis (WON). There has been concern about adverse events (AEs) with LAMS including bleeding, buried stent syndrome and migration. Prior to LAMS becoming available, fully-covered self-expandable metal esophageal and biliary stents (FCSEMSs) were used off-label for management of PC/WON with many centers demonstrating low rates of AEs. The primary aim of this study was to study the safety and efficacy of FCSEMS for the management of pseudocysts/WON. This was a retrospective review of all endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided placement of FCSEMSs for drainage of PC/WON cases performed at our institution over 4-year period. The primary outcomes studied were technical success, AEs, PC/WON resolution, and salvage surgical/radiologic intervention. Technical success achieved in 65 of 65 (100 %) study patients. An AE occurred 0 of 25 patients (0 %) with PC, and in 10 of 40 patients (25 %) with WON: bleeding (3 %), migration (5 %) and stent dysfunction/infection (18 %). There was resolution in 25 of 25 patients (100 %) with a PC and 31 of 40 patients (78 %) with a WON. Salvage therapy by interventional radiology or surgery was performed in nine of 40 patients (22 %). This single-center 4-year experience in the pre-LAMS era showed that FCSEMS was safe and effective in all patients with PC and over 75 % of patients with WON. Given the large cost differential between LAMS and FCSEMS and the efficacy and safety shown with FCSEMS, we believe that FCSEMS should still be considered a first-line option for patients with pancreatic fluid collections, particularly in patients with PCs.
管腔贴壁金属支架(LAMS)已被设计为用于处理假性囊肿(PC)/包裹性坏死(WON)的专利支架。人们一直担心LAMS会引发不良事件(AE),包括出血、埋藏支架综合征和移位。在LAMS上市之前,全覆膜自膨式金属食管和胆道支架(FCSEMS)被用于PC/WON的非适应证治疗,许多中心显示不良事件发生率较低。本研究的主要目的是研究FCSEMS治疗假性囊肿/WON的安全性和有效性。这是一项对我院在4年期间所有接受内镜超声(EUS)引导下放置FCSEMS引流PC/WON病例的回顾性研究。研究的主要结局指标包括技术成功率、不良事件、PC/WON消退情况以及补救性手术/放射介入治疗。65例研究患者中有65例(100%)取得技术成功。25例PC患者中有0例(0%)发生不良事件,40例WON患者中有10例(25%)发生不良事件:出血(3%)、移位(5%)和支架功能障碍/感染(18%)。25例PC患者中有25例(100%)消退,40例WON患者中有31例(78%)消退。40例患者中有9例(22%)接受了介入放射学或手术的补救治疗。在LAMS时代之前的这项单中心4年经验表明,FCSEMS对所有PC患者以及超过75%的WON患者是安全有效的。鉴于LAMS和FCSEMS之间存在巨大的成本差异以及FCSEMS所显示的有效性和安全性,我们认为FCSEMS仍应被视为胰腺液体积聚患者的一线选择,尤其是PC患者。