Newly designed, fully covered metal stents for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) have been adequately drained using multiple plastic stents placed in a single-step endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) procedure. Recent reports have presented the usefulness of metal stents for this procedure; however, there has been no prospective comparative study on their effectiveness and safety. We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare multiple plastic stents with fully covered, self-expanding metal stents (FCSEMSs) for the drainage of PFCs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2012 and May 2013, patients with PFCs demonstrated by various modalities were enrolled in our study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a FCSEMS or plastic stents for EUS-guided PFC drainage. The procedure time, technical success rate, and adverse event rates of the PFCs were evaluated.

RESULTS

50 patients (41 men) were included and randomly assigned to either the FCSEMS group (n = 25) or the plastic stent group (n = 25). The median procedure time with FCSEMS was significantly shorter than with plastic stents (15.0 min vs. 29.5 min, P < 0.01). The technical success rate was 100 % for both groups. The clinical success rate was 20 out of 23 for FCSEMS and 20 out of 22 for plastic stents (P = 0.97). No adverse events occurred in the FCSEMS group, while adverse events occurred in two patients in the plastic stent group (P = 0.16). One recurrence was observed during follow-up in the FCSEMS group and none in the plastic stent group (P = 0.15).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided PFC drainage with FCSEMSs is comparable to such drainage with plastic stents in terms of technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety; however, the use of FCSEMSs may also simplify and shorten the procedure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

KCT0000766 (https://cris.nih.go.kr).