• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于疑似结直肠癌患者的电子临床决策工具——对直肠出血患者的初步评估

An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer-Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding.

作者信息

Forbes Nauzer, Cooray Mohan, Hackett Michael, Shah Nishwa, Yuan Yuhong, Antiperovitch Pavel, Corner Tracey, Chan David, Mills Michael, Armstrong David, Xenodemetropoulos Ted

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;3(5):204-209. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz013. Epub 2019 May 22.

DOI:10.1093/jcag/gwz013
PMID:32905126
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7465547/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The electronic clinical decision-making application was designed to assist physicians with evaluation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer (CRC). The physician completes an interactive checklist of evidence-based clinical parameters, and a recommended referral urgency is generated based on the post-test probability of CRC. This study aimed toward validation of the tool in symptomatic patients presenting with rectal bleeding.

METHODS

The medical records of a sample of patients with histologically confirmed CRC from 2010 to 2014 were reviewed. The tool was applied retrospectively to all patients who initially presented with rectal bleeding, to determine its sensitivity for detecting CRC in this population. A generated recommendation of 'immediate referral' (referral ≤24 hours, expected endoscopy ≤2 weeks) or 'urgent referral' (expected consultation and endoscopy ≤4 and ≤8 weeks) was considered a positive test result. An a priori sensitivity of 90% was deemed adequate, based on test characteristics of the tool's individual clinical criteria.

RESULTS

The tool was applied to 281 patients. A total of 69 (24.6%) and 211 (75.1%) patients met criteria for immediate and urgent referral, respectively. The remaining patient (0.4%) met criteria for 'possible priority referral', while none met criteria for 'no specific action recommended'. This resulted in a calculated sensitivity of 99.6% (95% confidence interval 98.0 to 99.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The tool is sensitive in the prediction of CRC in patients presenting with rectal bleeding. A prospective cohort study is being designed to allow for acquisition of comprehensive test performance characteristics and full validation of the instrument.

摘要

背景与目的

电子临床决策应用程序旨在协助医生评估疑似结直肠癌(CRC)患者。医生完成一份基于证据的临床参数交互式清单,然后根据CRC的检测后概率生成推荐的转诊紧急程度。本研究旨在验证该工具在出现直肠出血症状的患者中的有效性。

方法

回顾了2010年至2014年组织学确诊为CRC的患者样本的病历。该工具被回顾性应用于所有最初表现为直肠出血的患者,以确定其在该人群中检测CRC的敏感性。生成的“立即转诊”(转诊≤24小时,预期内镜检查≤2周)或“紧急转诊”(预期会诊和内镜检查≤4周和≤8周)推荐被视为阳性检测结果。根据该工具各个临床标准的检测特征,先验敏感性90%被认为是足够的。

结果

该工具应用于281例患者。分别有69例(24.6%)和211例(75.1%)患者符合立即转诊和紧急转诊标准。其余1例患者(0.4%)符合“可能优先转诊”标准,而无人符合“不建议采取特定行动”标准。这导致计算出的敏感性为99.6%(95%置信区间98.0至99.9%)。

结论

该工具在预测出现直肠出血症状的患者的CRC方面具有敏感性。正在设计一项前瞻性队列研究,以获取全面的检测性能特征并对该仪器进行全面验证。

相似文献

1
An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer-Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding.一种用于疑似结直肠癌患者的电子临床决策工具——对直肠出血患者的初步评估
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;3(5):204-209. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz013. Epub 2019 May 22.
2
Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis.用于结直肠癌筛查的粪便潜血试验:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(10):1-40. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
3
Development and external validation of a faecal immunochemical test-based prediction model for colorectal cancer detection in symptomatic patients.基于粪便免疫化学检测的有症状患者结直肠癌检测预测模型的开发与外部验证
BMC Med. 2016 Aug 31;14(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0668-5.
4
5
A symptom-based model to predict colorectal cancer in low-resource countries: Results from a prospective study of patients at high risk for colorectal cancer.基于症状的模型预测资源匮乏国家的结直肠癌:一项对结直肠癌高危患者前瞻性研究的结果。
Cancer. 2018 Jul 1;124(13):2766-2773. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31399. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Minimal preparation computed tomography instead of barium enema/colonoscopy for suspected colon cancer in frail elderly patients: an outcome analysis study.针对体弱老年疑似结肠癌患者,采用低剂量CT平扫替代钡灌肠/结肠镜检查:一项结果分析研究
Clin Radiol. 2004 Jan;59(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.001.
7
8
Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for diagnosing colorectal cancer in patients with histories of rectal bleeding in primary care: a cohort study.基层医疗中用于诊断有直肠出血病史患者结直肠癌的定性粪便免疫化学检测(FITs):一项队列研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Nov;35(11):2035-2040. doi: 10.1007/s00384-020-03672-1. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
9
Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.粪便免疫化学检测用于在初级保健中对有下腹部症状的患者进行分流,以确定是否需要转诊疑似结直肠癌患者:一项系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 May;21(33):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta21330.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a risk score to stratify symptomatic adults referred for colonoscopy.用于对接受结肠镜检查的有症状成年人进行风险分层的风险评分的开发。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1890-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12638.
2
Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌筛查后的长期死亡率。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19;369(12):1106-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300720.
3
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
基于软性乙状结肠镜检查的筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001352. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm.在初级保健中识别疑似结直肠癌患者:算法的推导和验证。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jan;62(594):e29-37. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X616346.
5
The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidance.评分系统在识别有症状结直肠癌方面的诊断性能与当前转诊指南的比较。
Gut. 2011 Sep;60(9):1242-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.225987. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
6
Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.症状和额外诊断测试在初级保健中对结直肠癌的价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 31;340:c1269. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1269.
7
Diagnostic accuracy systematic review of rectal bleeding in combination with other symptoms, signs and tests in relation to colorectal cancer.直肠出血与其他症状、体征和检查联合用于结直肠癌诊断的准确性系统评价。
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 5;102(1):48-58. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605426. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
8
Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis.错失启动结直肠癌诊断内镜评估的机会。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2543-54. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.324. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
9
Diagnostic utility of alarm features for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠癌警报特征的诊断效用:系统评价与荟萃分析
Gut. 2008 Nov;57(11):1545-53. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.159723. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
10
Prediction of colorectal cancer by a patient consultation questionnaire and scoring system: a prospective study.通过患者咨询问卷和评分系统预测结直肠癌:一项前瞻性研究。
Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):278-83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09549-1.