• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于对接受结肠镜检查的有症状成年人进行风险分层的风险评分的开发。

Development of a risk score to stratify symptomatic adults referred for colonoscopy.

作者信息

Law Chee-Wei, Rampal Sanjay, Roslani April C, Mahadeva Sanjiv

机构信息

Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1890-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12638.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.12638
PMID:24909623
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

With an increasing burden on overstretched colonoscopy services, a simple risk score for significant pathology in symptomatic patients may aid in the prioritization of patients.

METHODS

A derivative study of a risk score model for colonic neoplasia (colorectal carcinoma [CRC] and advanced adenoma) and CRC alone was conducted in symptomatic adults referred for an index colonoscopy. The accuracy of the final model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 1013 subjects (mean age 59.9 ± 13.7 years, 52.3% females) from a multi-ethnic Asian background (Chinese 56%, Malay 20.4%, Indian 21.5%) were recruited. Colonic neoplasia and CRC were identified in 175 (17.3%) and 114 (11.3%) cases, respectively. Risk scores were assigned to individual factors identified in a logistic regression model of both demographic (age, gender, ethnicity, education level, smoking history, Aspirin use) and clinical symptoms (change in bowel habit, bloody stool, weight loss, appetite loss, lethargy). The risk score for each patient was the sum of their individual risk factors. The AUC of the risk score for colonic neoplasia and CRC was 0.76 (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic of P = 0.745) and 0.83 (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic of P = 0.982), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A simple risk score for colonic neoplasia and CRC may be able to prioritize colonoscopy referrals in symptomatic subjects from a multi-ethnic background. A further study to validate this scoring system is required.

摘要

背景与目的

随着结肠镜检查服务负担日益加重,针对有症状患者显著病变的简单风险评分可能有助于确定患者的优先次序。

方法

对因首次结肠镜检查而转诊的有症状成年人进行了一项关于结肠肿瘤(结直肠癌[CRC]和高级别腺瘤)及单独CRC风险评分模型的衍生研究。通过受试者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计量评估最终模型的准确性。

结果

共招募了1013名来自多民族亚洲背景(华人56%,马来人20.4%,印度人21.5%)的受试者(平均年龄59.9±13.7岁,女性占52.3%)。分别在175例(17.3%)和114例(11.3%)病例中发现了结肠肿瘤和CRC。对在人口统计学(年龄、性别、种族、教育水平、吸烟史、阿司匹林使用情况)和临床症状(排便习惯改变、便血、体重减轻、食欲减退、乏力)的逻辑回归模型中确定的各个因素赋予风险评分。每位患者的风险评分是其各个风险因素的总和。结肠肿瘤和CRC风险评分的AUC分别为0.76(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计量P = 0.745)和0.83(Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度统计量P = 0.982)。

结论

针对结肠肿瘤和CRC的简单风险评分或许能够对来自多民族背景的有症状受试者的结肠镜检查转诊进行优先排序。需要进一步开展研究以验证该评分系统。

相似文献

1
Development of a risk score to stratify symptomatic adults referred for colonoscopy.用于对接受结肠镜检查的有症状成年人进行风险分层的风险评分的开发。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Nov;29(11):1890-6. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12638.
2
Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Individuals With Self-Reported Family History: A Prospective Colonoscopy Study from 16 Asia-Pacific Regions.自我报告有家族病史者患结直肠肿瘤的风险:一项来自亚太16个地区的前瞻性结肠镜检查研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;111(11):1621-1629. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.52. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Individualized colorectal cancer screening based on the clinical risk factors: beyond family history of colorectal cancer.基于临床风险因素的个体化结直肠癌筛查:超越结直肠癌家族史。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Jul;88(1):128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
Predicting Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Adenoma Removal in a Large Community-Based Setting.在大型社区环境中,预测腺瘤切除后结直肠癌的风险。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Aug 1;119(8):1590-1599. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002721. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Combining risk factors with faecal immunochemical test outcome for selecting CRC screenees for colonoscopy.将风险因素与粪便免疫化学试验结果相结合,以选择接受结肠镜筛查的 CRC 筛查对象。
Gut. 2014 Mar;63(3):466-71. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305013. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
6
Development and validation of a risk stratification-based screening model for predicting colorectal advanced neoplasia in Korea.韩国用于预测结直肠高级别瘤变的基于风险分层的筛查模型的开发与验证
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;49(1):41-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000102.
7
Prediction of advanced colonic neoplasm in symptomatic patients: a scoring system to prioritize colonoscopy (COLONOFIT study).症状性患者中晚期结肠肿瘤的预测:一种优先考虑结肠镜检查的评分系统(COLONOFIT 研究)。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 25;19(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5926-4.
8
Usefulness of risk stratification models for colorectal cancer based on fecal hemoglobin concentration and clinical risk factors.基于粪便血红蛋白浓度和临床危险因素的结直肠癌风险分层模型的实用性。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1204-1211.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.02.023. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
9
Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.粪便血红蛋白可定义结直肠腺瘤性息肉患者在结直肠肿瘤筛查中风险。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Jun;8(5):559-566. doi: 10.1177/2050640620913674. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
10
Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool.使用美国国立癌症研究所结直肠癌风险评估工具预测不同人群结肠镜检查时的进展期肿瘤形成情况。
Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2663-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30096. Epub 2016 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The performance of FIT-based and other risk prediction models for colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients: a systematic review.有症状患者中基于粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)及其他结直肠肿瘤风险预测模型的性能:一项系统评价
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Sep 21;64:102204. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102204. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Possible Value of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) When Added in Symptomatic Patients Referred for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review.粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)应用于因结肠镜检查转诊的有症状患者时的潜在价值:一项系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 28;15(7):2011. doi: 10.3390/cancers15072011.
3
Multivariable models for advanced colorectal neoplasms in screen-eligible individuals at low-to-moderate risk of colorectal cancer: towards improving colonoscopy prioritization.
可用于结直肠癌低至中度筛查风险个体中筛选出有进展性结直肠肿瘤的多变量模型:旨在改善结肠镜检查的优先级。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01965-5.
4
Risk Factors for High-Risk Adenoma on the First Lifetime Colonoscopy Using Decision Tree Method: A Cross-Sectional Study in 6,047 Asymptomatic Koreans.使用决策树方法分析首次结肠镜检查时高危腺瘤的危险因素:对6047名无症状韩国人的横断面研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 23;8:719768. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.719768. eCollection 2021.
5
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
6
An Electronic Clinical Decision-Making Tool for Patients with Suspected Colorectal Cancer-Preliminary Evaluation in Patients Presenting with Rectal Bleeding.一种用于疑似结直肠癌患者的电子临床决策工具——对直肠出血患者的初步评估
J Can Assoc Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;3(5):204-209. doi: 10.1093/jcag/gwz013. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Effect of aspirin on the diagnostic accuracy of the faecal immunochemical test for colorectal advanced neoplasia.阿司匹林对粪便免疫化学检测结直肠进展性腺瘤诊断准确性的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Feb;6(1):123-130. doi: 10.1177/2050640617707094. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
8
Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool.使用美国国立癌症研究所结直肠癌风险评估工具预测不同人群结肠镜检查时的进展期肿瘤形成情况。
Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2663-70. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30096. Epub 2016 May 24.
9
The discriminatory capability of existing scores to predict advanced colorectal neoplasia: a prospective colonoscopy study of 5,899 screening participants.现有评分预测进展期结直肠肿瘤的鉴别能力:一项对5899名筛查参与者的前瞻性结肠镜检查研究
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 3;6:20080. doi: 10.1038/srep20080.
10
Colonoscopy appropriateness: Really needed or a waste of time?结肠镜检查的适宜性:真的有必要还是在浪费时间?
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):94-101. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.94.