• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair: An 11-Year Follow-Up.腹疝修补术的长期预后:11年随访
Cureus. 2020 Aug 2;12(8):e9523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9523.
2
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
3
Concomitant ventral hernia repair and bariatric surgery: a retrospective analysis from a UK-based bariatric center.同期腹疝修补术和减重手术:英国减重中心的回顾性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):705-710. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6492-6. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
4
Predictors of mortality after elective ventral hernia repair: an analysis of national inpatient sample.择期腹外疝修补术后死亡率的预测因素:全国住院患者样本分析。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):979-985. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1841-x. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
5
A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.一项比较腹腔镜与开放性腹疝修补术并发症发生率的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1778-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8851-5. Epub 2003 Sep 10.
6
Evaluation of high-risk, comorbid patients undergoing open ventral hernia repair with synthetic mesh.评估使用合成网片行开放型腹侧疝修补术的高危、合并症患者。
Surgery. 2013 Jan;153(1):120-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
7
Outcomes of concomitant ventral hernia repair performed during bariatric surgery.减肥手术期间同期进行腹侧疝修补术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5143-z. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
8
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in obese patients: a long-term follow-up.肥胖患者腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的长期随访
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):670-675. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4258-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
9
Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.猪脱细胞真皮基质与合成补片及缝线用于复杂开放性腹疝修补术的疗效比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):506-12. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.090. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
10
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair with onlay biosynthetic mesh: a retrospective review of associated risk factors and management strategies.网片暴露后腹疝修补与生物合成网片:回顾性分析相关危险因素和管理策略。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2165-2176. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03108-7. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
2
Platelet-Rich Therapies in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review of the Impact of Platelet Concentrates on Mesh Integration in Hernia Management.富血小板治疗在疝修补术中的应用:血小板浓缩物对疝管理中补片整合影响的综合评价。
Biomolecules. 2024 Jul 29;14(8):921. doi: 10.3390/biom14080921.
3
Outcomes of Biosynthetic and Synthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair.生物合成补片与合成补片用于腹疝修补的效果
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Dec 12;10(12):e4707. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004707. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Emergency repair and smoking predict recurrence in a large cohort of ventral hernia patients.紧急修复和吸烟可预测大样本腹疝患者的复发。
Hernia. 2022 Oct;26(5):1337-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02672-0. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
5
Shifting the Goalpost in Ventral Hernia Care: 5-year Outcomes after Ventral Hernia Repair with Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate Mesh.腹疝治疗中的目标转变:使用聚-4-羟基丁酸酯补片进行腹疝修补术后的5年结果
Hernia. 2022 Dec;26(6):1635-1643. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02674-y. Epub 2022 Sep 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Ventral Hernia Repair: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹疝修补术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Aug/Sep;18(6):647-658. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.029. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Factors Associated With Long-term Outcomes of Umbilical Hernia Repair.脐疝修补术长期预后的相关因素
JAMA Surg. 2017 May 1;152(5):461-466. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5052.
3
Ventral Hernia Management: Expert Consensus Guided by Systematic Review.腹疝管理:基于系统评价的专家共识
Ann Surg. 2017 Jan;265(1):80-89. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001701.
4
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
5
Biological Mesh Implants for Abdominal Hernia Repair: US Food and Drug Administration Approval Process and Systematic Review of Its Efficacy.生物补片在腹外疝修补术中的应用:美国食品药品监督管理局的审批流程及有效性的系统评价。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Apr;151(4):374-81. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5234.
6
Patient selection optimization following combined abdominal procedures: analysis of 4925 patients undergoing panniculectomy/abdominoplasty with or without concurrent hernia repair.联合腹部手术后患者选择的优化:对4925例行腹壁成形术/腹壁整形术(伴或不伴同期疝修补术)患者的分析
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Oct;134(4):539e-550e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000519.
7
The utilization of laparoscopy in ventral hernia repair: an update of outcomes analysis using ACS-NSQIP data.腹腔镜在腹疝修补术中的应用:使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据的结果分析更新
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1099-104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3798-x. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
8
Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗切口疝和腹疝的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2014 Sep;38(9):2233-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z.
9
Does mesh location matter in abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature and a summary of recommendations.网片位置在腹壁重建中重要吗?系统文献复习和推荐总结。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1295-1304. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a4c393.
10
Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair.开发并验证了一种用于开放式腹疝修补术后手术部位发生和手术部位感染的风险分层评分。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):974-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

腹疝修补术的长期预后:11年随访

Long-Term Outcomes of Ventral Hernia Repair: An 11-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Kadakia Nikita, Mudgway Ross, Vo Jonathan, Vong Vinson, Seto Tiffany, Bortz Pascal, Depew Aron

机构信息

Surgery, University of California Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, USA.

General Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Aug 2;12(8):e9523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9523.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.9523
PMID:32905150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7466072/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventral hernia repair (VHR) is one of the most common general surgery procedures; however, few studies with long-term follow-up of VHR outcomes exist.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of VHRs performed from 2000 to 2009 at a single institution. Our primary outcome was recurrence, and secondary outcomes were reoperations and complications including seroma, hematomas, abdominal wall abscess, wound infections, and mesh infections.

RESULTS

Our sample population (n=420; mean age 46.3±11.7 years) included 230 females (54.8%), and cases included laparoscopic (n=31; 7.5%), laparoscopic converted to open (n=7; 1.7%), and open (n=373, 90%). As compared to suture repairs, mesh repair was associated with lower rates of complications (25.7% vs 29.5%, p=0.10) and recurrence (12.8% vs 15.2%, p=0.67). Laparoscopic repairs had lower rates of complications than open repairs (25% vs 26.8%; p=0.70) but similar rates of recurrence (13.8% and 13.6%; p=0.53). After logistic regression, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, component separation technique, and prolonged operating time (>75th percentile) were associated with increased complications.

CONCLUSION

Obesity is a modifiable risk factor and must be addressed in patients undergoing VHRs. Mesh repair does not increase the risk of adverse long-term outcomes and may be performed safely in patients undergoing VHR.

摘要

背景

腹疝修补术(VHR)是最常见的普通外科手术之一;然而,很少有对VHR结果进行长期随访的研究。

方法

我们对2000年至2009年在单一机构进行的VHR进行了回顾性研究。我们的主要结局是复发,次要结局是再次手术和并发症,包括血清肿、血肿、腹壁脓肿、伤口感染和补片感染。

结果

我们的样本人群(n = 420;平均年龄46.3±11.7岁)包括230名女性(54.8%),病例包括腹腔镜手术(n = 31;7.5%)、腹腔镜中转开腹手术(n = 7;1.7%)和开腹手术(n = 373,90%)。与缝合修补相比,补片修补的并发症发生率(25.7%对29.5%,p = 0.10)和复发率(12.8%对15.2%,p = 0.67)较低。腹腔镜修补的并发症发生率低于开腹修补(25%对26.8%;p = 0.70),但复发率相似(13.8%和13.6%;p = 0.53)。经过逻辑回归分析,肥胖症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、成分分离技术和手术时间延长(>第75百分位数)与并发症增加相关。

结论

肥胖是一个可改变的风险因素,在接受VHR的患者中必须加以解决。补片修补不会增加长期不良结局的风险,在接受VHR的患者中可以安全进行。