BIOEPAR, INRAE, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
BIOEPAR, INRAE, ONIRIS, Nantes, France.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2020 Nov;229:110114. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2020.110114. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the main component of the porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC), which strongly impact the pig production. Although PRRSV is often considered as a primary infection that eases subsequent respiratory coinfections, the possibility that other PRDC components may facilitate PRRSV infection has been largely overlooked. The main cellular targets of PRRSV are respiratory macrophages among them alveolar macrophages (AM) and pulmonary intravascular macrophages (PIM). AM, contrarily to PIM, are directly exposed to the external respiratory environment, among them co-infectious agents. In order to explore the possibility of a co-infections impact on the capacity of respiratory macrophages to replicate PRRSV, we proceed to in vitro infection of AM and PIM sampled from animals presenting different sanitary status, and tested the presence in the respiratory tract of these animals of the most common porcine respiratory pathogens (PCV2, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Mycoplasma hyorhinis, Mycoplasma floculare, Pasteurella multocida, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Streptoccocus suis). In this exploratory study with a limited number of animals, no statistic differences were observed between AM and PIM susceptibility to in vitro PRRSV infection, nor between AM coming from animals presenting very contrasting respiratory coinfection loads.
猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒 (PRRSV) 是猪呼吸道疾病综合征 (PRDC) 的主要组成部分之一,它对养猪业有很大的影响。虽然 PRRSV 通常被认为是一种原发性感染,会减轻随后的呼吸道混合感染,但其他 PRDC 成分可能促进 PRRSV 感染的可能性在很大程度上被忽视了。PRRSV 的主要细胞靶标是呼吸道巨噬细胞,包括肺泡巨噬细胞 (AM) 和肺内血管巨噬细胞 (PIM)。与 PIM 相反,AM 直接暴露于外部呼吸环境中,包括其中的共感染性病原体。为了探索共感染对呼吸巨噬细胞复制 PRRSV 能力的影响的可能性,我们对来自具有不同卫生状况的动物的 AM 和 PIM 进行了体外感染,并检测了这些动物的呼吸道中是否存在最常见的猪呼吸道病原体 (PCV2、胸膜肺炎放线杆菌、肺炎支原体、猪鼻支原体、猪滑液支原体、多杀性巴氏杆菌、支气管败血波氏杆菌、猪链球菌)。在这项具有有限数量动物的探索性研究中,我们没有观察到 AM 和 PIM 对体外 PRRSV 感染的易感性之间存在统计学差异,也没有观察到来自具有非常不同呼吸道混合感染负荷的动物的 AM 之间存在统计学差异。