• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国诉马吉德·舒卡特·汗案:关塔那摩湾的首个裁决,考虑对被拘留者进行减刑的酷刑。

United States of America v. Majid Shoukat Khan: Guantánamo's first ruling to consider torture in mitigating sentencing for detainees.

机构信息

Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Columbia University Medical Center, Research Psychiatrist at the New York State Psychiatric Institute, Member of the Committee on Global Thought at Columbia University, 1051, Riverside Drive, Unit 11, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

出版信息

J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Oct;75:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102053. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102053
PMID:32905869
Abstract

In June 2020, a Guantánamo military judge ruled in United States of America v. Majid Shoukat Khan that he has the legal authority to mitigate Khan's criminal sentence as a remedy for illegal pretrial punishment if his attorneys prove that he suffered torture and other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment in government custody. This commentary analyzes the ruling and its implications for Guantánamo's legal system, detainees, and forensic medicine.

摘要

2020 年 6 月,关塔那摩军事法官在美利坚合众国诉马吉德·舒卡特·汗案中裁定,如果汗的律师证明他在政府拘留期间遭受酷刑和其他残忍、不人道或有辱人格的待遇,他有权减轻汗的刑事判决,作为对非法审前惩罚的补救。本评论分析了该裁决及其对关塔那摩法律体系、被拘留者和法医学的影响。

相似文献

1
United States of America v. Majid Shoukat Khan: Guantánamo's first ruling to consider torture in mitigating sentencing for detainees.美国诉马吉德·舒卡特·汗案:关塔那摩湾的首个裁决,考虑对被拘留者进行减刑的酷刑。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Oct;75:102053. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.102053. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Forensic mental health evaluations in the Guantánamo military commissions system: An analysis of all detainee cases from inception to 2018.关塔那摩军事委员会系统中的法医心理健康评估:从成立到 2018 年所有被拘留者案件的分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
International law and mental health evaluations at Guantanamo: Is medical repatriation a solution for most detainees?国际法与关塔那摩的精神健康评估:遣返医疗是大多数被拘留者的解决方案吗?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 May-Jun;76:101682. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101682. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
4
Implications of the 2014 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report for Forensic Mental Health in the War on Terror.2014年参议院情报特别委员会报告对反恐战争中法医精神健康的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2015 Sep;43(3):350-8.
5
Justification doctrine in the prohibition on torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.禁止酷刑、残忍、不人道或有辱人格待遇方面的正当理由原则。
Torture. 2008;18(2):116-29.
6
Treating war detainees and terror suspects: legal and ethical responsibilities of military physicians.对战俘和恐怖主义嫌疑人的治疗:军队医生的法律与道德责任
Mil Med. 2007 Dec;172(12 Suppl):15-21. doi: 10.7205/milmed.173.supplement_2.15.
7
The manipulation of minds:reckoning with the legacy of the american post 9/11 torture program.《操控人心:清算美国“9·11”后酷刑项目的遗产》。
Torture. 2022;32(3):71-83. doi: 10.7146/torture.v32i3.131962.
8
Glimpses of Guantanamo--medical ethics and the war on terror.关塔那摩一瞥——医学伦理与反恐战争
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 15;353(24):2529-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp058296.
9
Torture vs other cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment: is the distinction real or apparent?酷刑与其他残忍、不人道和有辱人格的待遇:这种区别是真实存在还是表面现象?
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;64(3):277-85. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.3.277.
10
Standardizing psycho-medical torture during the War on Terror: Why it happened, how it happened, and why it didn't work.在反恐战争期间规范精神医学折磨:它为何发生、如何发生以及为何无效。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Dec;171:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 10.