12 个月的肺部远程康复与标准肺部康复随访比较：一项针对严重 COPD 患者的多中心随机临床试验。
12-months follow-up of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation: A multicentre randomised clinical trial in patients with severe COPD.
机构信息
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark; Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, And Innovation and Research Centre for Multimorbidity and Chronic Conditions, Region Zealand, Denmark.
出版信息
Respir Med. 2020 Oct;172:106129. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2020.106129. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Between March 2016 and October 2017, we randomised 134 patients with severe COPD from 8 hospitals in the Capital Region of Denmark to participate in either standardised, outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (control group) or on-line, supervised and home-based tele-rehabilitation (intervention group). We found no difference between the groups in the primary outcome: six minutes walking distance (6MWD) after completion of the programme. The current study presents results from the 12-month follow-up with assessment of the 6MWD and analyses of hospitalisation and mortality. There were no significant differences between or within the groups in the 6MWD one year after completion of the programme.
在 2016 年 3 月至 2017 年 10 月期间，我们从丹麦首都地区的 8 家医院随机招募了 134 名患有严重 COPD 的患者，将他们分为标准的门诊肺康复组（对照组）或在线监督的家庭远程康复组（干预组）。我们发现两组在主要结果（即方案完成后 6 分钟步行距离）上没有差异。本研究报告了 12 个月随访的结果，评估了 6 分钟步行距离，并分析了住院和死亡率。在方案完成一年后，两组之间或组内的 6 分钟步行距离均无显著差异。
Zotero 插件