Nielsen Christina, Godtfredsen Nina, Molsted Stig, Ulrik Charlotte, Kallemose Thomas, Hansen Henrik
Respiratory Research Unit and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0312742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312742. eCollection 2025.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) costs EURO 1.4 billion annually in healthcare costs. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a vital aspect of care for patients with COPD, but despite the compelling evidence, it is delivered to less than 30%. Frequent transport to the center-based program is regularly reported as reasons for non-attendance. The effectiveness and feasibility of pulmonary tele-rehabilitation (PTR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HPR) have never been investigated in patients with COPD who are unable to attend conventional outpatient PR.
This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial consisting of three parallel groups; PTR, HPR and a control group. 180 patients with moderate to very severe COPD, who are unable to attend in center-based PR programs will be included. The PTR group receives group-based resistance- and endurance training and patient education 60 min. twice a week for 10-weeks. HPR comprises an individual self-initiated home-based PR program with online motivational and professional counseling. The goal is to achieve at least 20 min. of muscle-endurance based exercises three days weekly for 10-weeks. The PTR and HPR group use a tablet with a conference system. The control group receives usual care (no PR). After completion of the intervention, the PTR and HPR groups are offered 65-weeks groupbased maintance program supervised once a week online via tablet. The primary outcome is change in respiratory symptoms measured with the COPD Assessment Test after 10-weeks (primary endpoint).
The study aims to test a possible equivalence between PTR and HPR and their superiority to controls on respiratory symptoms. The study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of new rehabilitation models and maintenance programs for patients with COPD. If the two new delivery models can reduce respiratory symptoms, patients with moderate to very severe COPD can participate in both home- or centerbased PR.
The trial is registrered and approved by the Ethics Committee of The Capital Region of Denmark (H-22015777; 29.08.2022) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2022-245-13101, 25.05.2022). The trial is registrered at ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05664945 (23.12.2022).
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)每年的医疗费用高达14亿欧元。肺康复(PR)是COPD患者护理的重要方面,但尽管有确凿证据,接受肺康复治疗的患者却不到30%。经常报告称,频繁前往中心项目治疗是患者不参加的原因。对于无法参加传统门诊肺康复治疗的COPD患者,肺远程康复(PTR)和家庭肺康复(HPR)的有效性和可行性从未得到过研究。
本研究是一项多中心随机对照试验,由三个平行组组成;PTR组、HPR组和对照组。将纳入180例中度至重度COPD患者,他们无法参加基于中心的肺康复项目。PTR组接受为期10周、每周两次、每次60分钟的基于小组的阻力和耐力训练以及患者教育。HPR包括一个由患者自行发起的家庭肺康复项目,并提供在线激励和专业咨询。目标是在10周内每周三天进行至少20分钟的基于肌肉耐力的锻炼。PTR组和HPR组使用带有会议系统的平板电脑。对照组接受常规护理(不进行肺康复)。干预完成后,PTR组和HPR组将通过平板电脑接受为期65周、每周一次在线监督的小组维持项目。主要结局是10周后用慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试测量的呼吸症状变化(主要终点)。
本研究旨在测试PTR和HPR之间可能的等效性及其在呼吸症状方面优于对照组的情况。该研究将为COPD患者新的康复模式和维持项目的有效性提供有价值的见解。如果这两种新的治疗模式能够减轻呼吸症状,中度至重度COPD患者就可以参加家庭或中心肺康复治疗。
该试验已在丹麦首都地区伦理委员会(H-22015777;2022年8月29日)和丹麦数据保护局(P-2022-245-13101,2022年5月25日)注册并获得批准。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符:NCT05664945(2022年12月23日)。