Department of Diagnostic, Clinic and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Department of Diagnostic, Clinic and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Pathol Res Pract. 2020 Nov;216(11):153189. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2020.153189. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
The aim of the study is to report the experience of the pathologists of the Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) (group formed by pathologists with various experience) on the morphological assessment of digital slides pertaining to IBD and Non-IBD colitis underlining the necessity to implement this tool in daily routine and its utility to share opinions on difficult cases.
Forty-eight histological slides stained with haematoxylin and eosin obtained from ileo-colorectal endoscopic biopsies were digitized using Menarini D-Sight 2.0 system, uploaded onto a website platform and shared among 40 pathologists participating in the study. Information regarding the site of biopsy was disclosed; clinical data were blinded. Each participant was committed to write a comment on microscopic features purposing diagnostic opinion. One month after the last uploaded case, a form was sent to each participant to evaluate the personal experience on digital slide sharing.
Sixteen pathologists out of 40 (40%) had consistently accessed to the site,9/40 (22%) commented on all slides, a diagnostic opinion was rendered in 8 slides. Most common critical issues were: A) poor internet connection resulting in ineffective evaluation of the digital slides, B) time-consuming cases raising difficult diagnostic interpretation, C) lack of clinical history. Overall, 24 participants (60%) found the forum valuable for practical training and educational purposes.
Sharing scanned slides circulating within a dedicated forum is an effective educational tool in both IBDs and Non-IBDs colitis. Although our results demonstrated a substantial compliance of the participants, their limited participation was an objective shortcoming. Hence, further efforts are needed to encourage this potentially rewarding practice among the pathologist community.
本研究旨在报告意大利炎症性肠病研究组(IBD)病理学家(由具有不同经验的病理学家组成的小组)在对 IBD 和非 IBD 结肠炎的数字切片进行形态评估方面的经验,强调在日常工作中实施这一工具的必要性,以及其在分享困难病例意见方面的实用性。
使用 Menarini D-Sight 2.0 系统对 48 张来自回肠结肠内镜活检的苏木精和伊红染色的组织学切片进行数字化,将其上传到一个网站平台上,并由 40 名参与研究的病理学家共享。提供了活检部位的信息;临床数据被屏蔽。每位参与者都承诺在显微镜特征上写评论,提出诊断意见。在最后一个上传病例一个月后,向每位参与者发送一份表格,以评估他们对数字切片共享的个人经验。
40 名病理学家中有 16 名(40%)持续访问该网站,9/40(22%)对所有切片进行了评论,8 张切片做出了诊断意见。最常见的关键问题是:A)互联网连接不良,导致数字切片评估无效,B)耗时的病例导致难以做出诊断解释,C)缺乏临床病史。总体而言,24 名参与者(60%)认为该论坛对实践培训和教育目的具有价值。
在专门的论坛中共享扫描切片是 IBD 和非 IBD 结肠炎中有效的教育工具。尽管我们的结果显示参与者的遵守情况很高,但他们的参与有限是一个客观的缺点。因此,需要进一步努力鼓励病理学家社区采用这种潜在有益的实践。