Department of Orthopaedics, Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey.
Department of Orthopaedics, Stryker, Manchester, United Kingdom.
J Knee Surg. 2022 Jan;35(2):198-203. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1716983. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Implant malalignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may lead to suboptimal postoperative outcomes. Accuracy studies are typically performed with experienced surgeons; however, it is important to study less experienced surgeons when considering teaching hospitals where younger surgeons operate. Therefore, this study assessed whether robotic-arm assisted TKA (RATKA) allowed for more accurate and precise implant position to plan when compared with manual techniques when the surgery is performed by in-training orthopaedic surgical fellows. Two surgeons, currently in their fellowship training and having minimal RATKA experience, performed a total of six manual TKA (MTKA) and six RATKAs on paired cadaver knees. Computed tomography scans were obtained for each knee pre- and postoperatively. These scans were analyzed using a custom autosegmentation and autoregistration process to compare postoperative implant position with the preoperative planned position. Mean system errors and standard deviations were compared between RATKA and MTKA for the femoral component for sagittal, coronal, and axial planes and for the tibial component in the sagittal and coronal planes. A 2-Variance testing was performed using an = 0.05. Although not statistically significant, RATKA was found to have greater accuracy and precision to plan than MTKA for: femoral axial plane (1.1° ± 1.1° vs. 1.6° ± 1.3°), coronal plane (0.9° ± 0.7° vs. 2.2° ± 1.0°), femoral sagittal plane (1.5° ± 1.3° vs. 3.1° ± 2.1°), tibial coronal plane (0.9° ± 0.5° vs. 1.9° ± 1.3°), and tibial sagittal plane (1.7° ± 2.6° vs. 4.7° ± 4.1°). There were no statistical differences between surgical groups or between the two surgeons performing the cases. With limited RATKA experience, fellows showed increased accuracy and precision to plan for femoral and tibial implant positions. Furthermore, these results were comparable to what has been reported for an experienced surgeon performing RATKA.
全膝关节置换术中(TKA)的植入物对线不良可能导致术后结果不理想。准确性研究通常由经验丰富的外科医生进行;然而,在考虑教学医院时,年轻外科医生进行手术,研究经验较少的外科医生非常重要。因此,本研究评估了当由接受培训的骨科住院医师进行手术时,机器人辅助 TKA(RATKA)是否比手动技术更能实现植入物位置的准确性和精确性,从而实现计划。两名外科医生,目前正在接受住院医师培训,并且只有很少的 RATKA 经验,总共对配对的尸体膝关节进行了六次手动 TKA(MTKA)和六次 RATKA。对每个膝关节进行术前和术后 CT 扫描。使用自定义自动分割和自动配准过程分析这些扫描,以比较术后植入物位置与术前计划位置。在矢状面、冠状面和轴面的股骨组件以及矢状面和冠状面的胫骨组件中,比较 RATKA 和 MTKA 的平均系统误差和标准差。使用 = 0.05 进行 2-Variance 检验。尽管没有统计学意义,但与 MTKA 相比,RATKA 发现具有更高的准确性和精度来计划:股骨轴向平面(1.1°±1.1°与 1.6°±1.3°)、冠状平面(0.9°±0.7°与 2.2°±1.0°)、股骨矢状面(1.5°±1.3°与 3.1°±2.1°)、胫骨冠状面(0.9°±0.5°与 1.9°±1.3°)和胫骨矢状面(1.7°±2.6°与 4.7°±4.1°)。手术组之间或执行病例的两名外科医生之间没有统计学差异。在有限的 RATKA 经验下,住院医师在股骨和胫骨植入物位置的计划方面表现出更高的准确性和精度。此外,这些结果与经验丰富的外科医生执行 RATKA 时的报告结果相当。