Lei Xuefeng, Zhu Shuangshuang, Li Zhenyang, Hong Jin, Liu Zhenhai, Tao Fei, Zou Peng, Song Maoxin, Li Congfei
Opt Express. 2020 Aug 17;28(17):25480-25489. doi: 10.1364/OE.393897.
The particulate observing scanning polarimeter (POSP) measurement spatial response function (SRF) relates to the weighted contribution of each location within the measurement footprint, which is determined by the percentage of the dwell time of each location on the Earth surface to the overall sampling integration time. The SRF resulting from a combination of the equally weighted instantaneous field of view (IFOV) during integration is required for an accurate modeling. Simply using a mean value SRF assuming an equivalent weight at each sampling position instead of the actual SRF will inevitably introduce errors. Considering the data fusion between POSP and high spatial resolution sensors, a discrete integration method that takes the effect of actual weights into account is proposed in this paper. The simulation results of the integral model and the mean value model show that the larger the intensity change in the sampling area covered by the IFOV of the POSP during a single sampling, the more significant the difference between the two results. Meanwhile, the integration SRF is validated by resampling the simultaneous imaging polarization camera (SIPC) data, which is compared with POSP data acquired at the same time in an aerial experiment. The results show that the integration SRF model is more accurate to characterize the details of POSP measurement than the mean value SRF model. The proposed SRF reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) of convolved results and measurements by 5∼30% with different radiance contrast scene.
颗粒观测扫描偏振计(POSP)测量空间响应函数(SRF)与测量足迹内每个位置的加权贡献相关,该加权贡献由每个位置在地球表面的驻留时间占总采样积分时间的百分比确定。准确建模需要积分期间等权重瞬时视场(IFOV)组合产生的SRF。简单地使用假设每个采样位置具有等效权重的平均值SRF而不是实际SRF将不可避免地引入误差。考虑到POSP与高空间分辨率传感器之间的数据融合,本文提出了一种考虑实际权重影响的离散积分方法。积分模型和平均值模型的仿真结果表明,在单次采样期间POSP的IFOV覆盖的采样区域内强度变化越大,两者结果之间的差异就越显著。同时,通过对同步成像偏振相机(SIPC)数据进行重采样来验证积分SRF,并将其与航空实验中同时获取的POSP数据进行比较。结果表明,与平均值SRF模型相比,积分SRF模型在表征POSP测量细节方面更准确。所提出的SRF在不同辐射对比度场景下将卷积结果与测量值的均方根误差(RMSE)降低了5%至30%。