• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冬季植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)与不良临床结局相关。

Winter LVAD implantation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

作者信息

Imamura Teruhiko, Combs Pamela, Siddiqi Umar, Cohen William, Besser Stephanie, LaBuhn Colleen, Mirzai Saeid, Jeevanandam Valluvan

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Second Department of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Mar;44(3):188-193. doi: 10.1177/0391398820951810. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1177/0391398820951810
PMID:32907458
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The seasonal variation of incidence and severity of heart failure is well known. However, the impact of seasonal variation on clinical outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who received LVAD implantation between January 2014 and December 2016 along with their first year of post-implant outcomes. Clinical outcomes were compared between those with winter LVAD implantation (between October and March) and those with non-winter LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

168 patients with a median age of 57 years and 130 males were included. There was no seasonal difference in the number of LVAD implantations. One-year survival free from major adverse events was significantly lower in the winter implant group ( = 88) compared to the non-winter group ( = 80) (44% vs 61%) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.81 (95% confidence interval 1.11-2.90, = 0.014), largely due to a higher rate of heart failure readmission in the winter implant patients (incidence rate ratio 2.29, 95% confidence interval 0.89-5.84).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent LVAD implantation during the winter season had a higher heart failure readmission rate. A detailed mechanism and therapeutic strategy given our findings warrant further investigation.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭发病率和严重程度的季节性变化众所周知。然而,季节性变化对左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入术后临床结局的影响仍不清楚。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2016年12月期间连续接受LVAD植入的患者及其植入后第一年的结局。比较冬季(10月至3月)植入LVAD的患者与非冬季植入LVAD的患者的临床结局。

结果

纳入168例患者,中位年龄57岁,男性130例。LVAD植入数量无季节性差异。冬季植入组(n = 88)1年无重大不良事件生存率显著低于非冬季组(n = 80)(44%对61%),调整后风险比为1.81(95%置信区间1.11 - 2.90,P = 0.014),主要原因是冬季植入患者心力衰竭再入院率较高(发病率比2.29,95%置信区间0.89 - 5.84)。

结论

冬季接受LVAD植入的患者心力衰竭再入院率较高。鉴于我们的研究结果,详细的机制和治疗策略值得进一步研究。

相似文献

1
Winter LVAD implantation is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.冬季植入左心室辅助装置(LVAD)与不良临床结局相关。
Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Mar;44(3):188-193. doi: 10.1177/0391398820951810. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Impact of age on outcomes following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.年龄对连续流左心室辅助装置植入术后结局的影响。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):743-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv051. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
3
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
Which advanced heart failure therapy strategy is optimal for patients over 60 years old?哪种晚期心力衰竭治疗策略对60岁以上的患者最为合适?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2019 Apr;60(2):251-258. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10593-3. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Outcomes and Predictors of Readmissions with GI Bleeding in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者胃肠道出血再入院的结局与预测因素
South Med J. 2018 Nov;111(11):666-673. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000883.
6
Mitral valve repair for severe mitral valve regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation.在左心室辅助装置植入期间修复严重二尖瓣反流的二尖瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1841-1848.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.071. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
7
Early Right Ventricular Assist Device Use in Patients Undergoing Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Incidence and Risk Factors From the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support.接受连续血流左心室辅助装置植入患者早期使用右心室辅助装置:来自机构间机械辅助循环支持注册中心的发生率及危险因素
Circ Heart Fail. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.003863.
8
Relationship of tricuspid repair at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation and survival.左心室辅助装置植入时三尖瓣修复与生存的关系。
Int J Artif Organs. 2014 Nov;37(11):834-8. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000369. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
9
Incidence and clinical significance of late right heart failure during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support.连续流左心室辅助装置支持期间晚期右心衰竭的发生率及临床意义
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Aug;34(8):1024-32. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
Electrical storm in patients with left ventricular assist devices: Risk factors, incidence, and impact on survival.左心室辅助装置患者中的电风暴:危险因素、发生率和对生存的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2021 Aug;18(8):1263-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.03.047. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Forecasting heart failure: Seasonal alignment of heart failure outcomes in New York.预测心力衰竭:纽约心力衰竭结局的季节性关联
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;12(2):819-831. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14964. Epub 2024 Nov 16.