Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Level 3 George Singer Building, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia; and Corresponding author. Email:
Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Level 3 George Singer Building, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. 2021 Feb;27(1):43-49. doi: 10.1071/PY20043.
This study investigated maternal and child health (MCH) nurse family violence clinical practices, practice gaps and future family violence training needs. Descriptive analysis was conducted of routine data collected as part of a larger MCH nurse family violence training project conducted in 2018. A purposive sample of routine data (2017-18) was analysed from six Victorian metropolitan and four regional and rural areas that were experiencing high rates of violence, as indicated by police reports. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were used to identify rates of nurse family violence screening, safety planning and referral, with practice differences analysed across locations. MCH nurses ask only one in two clients about family violence at the mandated 4-week postnatal clinic visit. Overall, metropolitan nurses screen for family violence at higher rates than rural nurses. Safety planning rates were low (1.3%), suggesting that screening is not translating to disclosure rates equivalent to state-wide prevalence (~14-17%) or police data. Nurse referrals are even lower (<1%), with practice differences noted across reporting systems. Despite data collection limitations, analysis of routine data shows significant gaps in nurse family violence screening and response practices. This evidence reinforces the need for systems changes to address family violence and other maternal health and social issues.
本研究调查了母婴健康(MCH)护士在家庭暴力方面的临床实践、实践差距以及未来家庭暴力培训需求。对 2018 年开展的母婴健康护士家庭暴力培训项目中收集的常规数据进行了描述性分析。从六个大都市和四个地区和农村地区中抽取了有目的的常规数据(2017-18 年),这些地区的暴力发生率很高,这是根据警方报告显示的。使用描述性统计和回归分析来确定护士进行家庭暴力筛查、安全计划和转介的比率,并分析了不同地点之间的实践差异。MCH 护士在规定的产后 4 周门诊就诊时仅询问了一半客户有关家庭暴力的情况。总体而言,大都市护士进行家庭暴力筛查的比例高于农村护士。安全计划的比率很低(1.3%),这表明筛查并未转化为与全州流行率(约 14-17%)或警方数据相当的披露率。护士的转介率甚至更低(<1%),不同的报告系统存在实践差异。尽管存在数据收集的限制,但对常规数据的分析表明,在护士对家庭暴力及其他母婴健康和社会问题的筛查和应对实践方面存在重大差距。这一证据强调需要进行系统变革,以解决家庭暴力及其他母婴健康和社会问题。