Judith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Department of General Practice, Faculty Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104625. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104625. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Intimate partner violence victims regularly seek health care and support. Health care providers need to understand the complexities of partner violence and how to safely respond to clients. Policy guiding nurse identification and responses exist, yet practices and education are lagging. Maternal and Child Health nurses are required to address intimate partner violence, yet their knowledge and preparedness to undertake this work is under-explored. The most effective methods of provider training are unknown.
A cross sectional research design.
Australian community based Maternal and Child Health nursing workforce.
Online survey conducted in June 2018. Survey questions explored nurse characteristics, knowledge and 'preparedness' to complete intimate partner violence work and previous violence training. Descriptive analysis involved reporting proportions within categories. Proportional group differences were analysed using Chi square test of independence. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Survey response rate was 65% (735/1125). Nurses feel well prepared to complete intimate partner violence practices, although differences were seen across groups. Rural nurses feel less prepared than metropolitan colleagues, especially conducting safety assessments and documentation. Nurse co-ordinators are the most prepared. A dose response relationship is seen between training and preparedness: nurses with greater (>10 h) and more recent training (within 5 years) report being more prepared for intimate partner violence work.
Greater systems supports are needed for sustainable nurse intimate partner violence work. In particular, opportunities are needed for rural nurse training, delivered locally and tailored to rural needs and context. Nurse co-ordinators are key leaders to achieving sustained nurse intimate partner violence practices.
亲密伴侣暴力的受害者经常寻求医疗保健和支持。医疗保健提供者需要了解伴侣暴力的复杂性以及如何安全地回应客户。存在指导护士识别和反应的政策,但实践和教育仍存在滞后。母婴健康护士需要解决亲密伴侣暴力问题,但他们在这方面的知识和准备程度仍未得到充分探索。最有效的提供者培训方法尚不清楚。
1)评估母婴健康护士亲密伴侣暴力培训水平以及护士准备解决伴侣暴力问题的程度;2)比较按护士地点、角色和培训水平划分的准备情况的组间差异。
横断面研究设计。
澳大利亚社区为基础的母婴健康护理劳动力。
2018 年 6 月进行在线调查。调查问题探讨了护士的特征、知识和“准备”完成亲密伴侣暴力工作以及以前的暴力培训情况。描述性分析包括报告类别内的比例。使用独立性卡方检验分析比例组间差异。统计显著性设为 p < 0.05。
调查回复率为 65%(735/1125)。护士认为自己完全有能力完成亲密伴侣暴力实践,但不同群体之间存在差异。农村护士比大都市同事准备不足,特别是进行安全评估和记录。护士协调员的准备程度最高。培训与准备之间存在剂量反应关系:接受过更多(>10 小时)和最近(5 年内)培训的护士报告称,他们对亲密伴侣暴力工作的准备更充分。
需要为可持续的护士亲密伴侣暴力工作提供更大的系统支持。特别是需要为农村护士提供培训机会,培训应在当地进行,并针对农村的需求和背景进行调整。护士协调员是实现持续护士亲密伴侣暴力实践的关键领导者。