Thorsen Sannie Vester, Flyvholm Mari-Ann, Pedersen Jacob, Bültmann Ute, Andersen Lars L, Bjorner Jakob Bue
Analysis and Data, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
Analysis and Data, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Occup Environ Med. 2021 Jan;78(1):46-53. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106554. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
This study examined if the association between work environment factors and sickness absence (SA) depended on the inclusion or exclusion of short-term SA episodes.
We linked the 'Work Environment and Health in Denmark' survey with the 'Danish Register of Work Absences' (n=27 678). Using covariate adjusted Cox regression, we examined the associations between work environment factors and SA by changing the cut-off points for the length of the SA episodes, for example, episodes ≥1 day, ≥6 days and ≥21 days. We examined three physical work environment factors: 'Back bend or twisted', 'Lifting or carrying', 'Wet hands' and three psychosocial work environment factors: 'Poor influence', 'Role conflicts' and 'Bullying'.
'Back bend or twisted' and 'Lifting or carrying' had small significant HRs for SA episodes ≥1 day and large and highly significant HRs for SA episodes ≥6 days and ≥21 days. 'Wet hands' had small significant HRs for SA episodes ≥1 day for both sexes and large and highly significant HR for ≥6 days for women. HRs of all three psychosocial factors were highly significant for SA episodes ≥1 day and ≥6 days for both sexes, and 'Poor influence' and 'Role conflicts' were significant for SA episodes ≥21 days for women.
The physical work factors had higher associations with SA when SA episodes of 1-5 days were excluded and focus was on SA episodes ≥6 days. The psychosocial work factors were strongly associated with SA both with and without SA episodes of 1-5 days included in the analyses.
本研究探讨工作环境因素与病假缺勤(SA)之间的关联是否取决于短期SA发作的纳入或排除。
我们将“丹麦工作环境与健康”调查与“丹麦工作缺勤登记册”(n = 27678)相链接。使用协变量调整后的Cox回归,我们通过改变SA发作时长的截断点,例如发作≥1天、≥6天和≥21天,来研究工作环境因素与SA之间的关联。我们考察了三个物理工作环境因素:“背部弯曲或扭转”、“提举或搬运”、“湿手”以及三个社会心理工作环境因素:“不良影响”、“角色冲突”和“欺凌”。
对于SA发作≥1天,“背部弯曲或扭转”和“提举或搬运”的风险比(HR)有小幅度显著差异;对于SA发作≥6天和≥21天,其HR有大幅度且高度显著差异。对于SA发作≥1天,“湿手”在两性中的HR有小幅度显著差异;对于女性,SA发作≥6天的HR有大幅度且高度显著差异。对于SA发作≥1天和≥6天,所有三个社会心理因素的HR在两性中均高度显著;对于女性,SA发作≥21天,“不良影响”和“角色冲突”的HR显著。
当排除1 - 5天的SA发作并关注≥6天的SA发作时,物理工作因素与SA的关联更高。无论分析中是否纳入1 - 5天的SA发作,社会心理工作因素与SA均有强烈关联。