Jia Haonan, Fang Huiying, Chen Ruohui, Jiao Mingli, Wei Lifeng, Zhang Gangyu, Li Yuanheng, Wang Ying, Wang Yameng, Jiang Kexin, Li Jingqun, Jia Xiaowen, Ismael Omar Yacouba, Mao Jingfu, Wu Qunhong
Department of Medical Affairs, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Health Policy and Hospital Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e037464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037464.
The purpose of this study is to examine workplace violence (WPV) towards healthcare professionals in a multiethnic area in China, including prevalence, influencing factors, healthcare professionals' response to WPV, expected antiviolence training measures and content, and evaluation of WPV interventions.
A cross-sectional study.
A grade III, class A hospital in the capital of Yunnan Province, which is the province with the most diverse ethnic minority groups in China.
In total, 2036 healthcare professionals participated, with a response rate of 83.79%.
The prevalence of physical and psychological violence was 5.5% and 43.7%, respectively. Healthcare professionals of ethnic minority were more likely to experience psychological violence (OR=1.54, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.05). Stratified by gender, male healthcare professionals of ethnic minority suffered from more physical violence (OR=3.31, 95% CI 1.12 to 9.79), while female healthcare professionals suffered from psychological violence (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.36). We also found a unique work situation in China: overtime duty on-call work (18:00-07:00) was a risk factor for psychological violence (OR=1.40, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.93). Healthcare professionals of ethnic minority are less likely to order perpetrators to stop or to report to superiors when faced with psychological violence. They are also more interested in receiving training in force skills and self-defence. Both Han and ethnic minority participants considered security measures as the most useful intervention, while changing the time of shift the most useless one.
Our study comprehensively described WPV towards healthcare professionals in a multiethnic minority area. More research on WPV conducted in multiethnic areas is needed.
本研究旨在调查中国一个多民族地区针对医护人员的工作场所暴力(WPV)情况,包括发生率、影响因素、医护人员对WPV的应对方式、预期的反暴力培训措施及内容,以及对WPV干预措施的评估。
横断面研究。
位于中国少数民族最多样化的云南省省会的一家三甲医院。
共有2036名医护人员参与,应答率为83.79%。
身体暴力和心理暴力的发生率分别为5.5%和43.7%。少数民族医护人员更容易遭受心理暴力(OR=1.54,95%CI 1.16至2.05)。按性别分层,少数民族男性医护人员遭受更多身体暴力(OR=3.31,95%CI 1.12至9.79),而少数民族女性医护人员遭受心理暴力(OR=1.71,95%CI 1.24至2.36)。我们还发现了中国特有的工作情况:加班值班(18:00至07:00)是心理暴力的一个危险因素(OR=1.40,95%CI 1.02至1.93)。少数民族医护人员在面对心理暴力时,不太可能命令施暴者停止或向上级报告。他们也对接受武力技能和自卫培训更感兴趣。汉族和少数民族参与者都认为安全措施是最有用的干预措施,而改变轮班时间是最没用的措施。
我们的研究全面描述了多民族地区针对医护人员的WPV情况。需要在多民族地区开展更多关于WPV的研究。