Proctor Robert W, Healy Alice F
Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third St., West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309-0345, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Feb;83(2):637-657. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02116-w.
Charles Eriksen and colleagues conducted influential visual-search experiments with circular arrays for which the responses were either vocal naming or unimanual left-right switch movements. These methods have the advantages of the stimuli being equidistant from a centered fixation point and allowing study of visual selection and response selection when effector selection is not required, as in the more typical case in which responses are key presses of distinct fingers. Other researchers have used similar spatial arrangements, but with aimed movements of the limb or of a mouse-controlled cursor to study effects of stimulus identification, visual search, spatial stimulus-response compatibility, response-effect compatibility, and practice/transfer in isolation and jointly. We systematically review studies in these areas that include visual selection and response selection and execution, and examine implications of their results for the role of effector selection. Also, we illustrate that as one moves from simpler to more complex tasks, the results are consistent with a basic information-processing framework in which stimulus identification and selection of a target response location are distinct from selecting, planning, and moving an effector to the targeted location.
查尔斯·埃里克森及其同事用圆形阵列进行了有影响力的视觉搜索实验,实验中的反应要么是口头命名,要么是单手左右切换动作。这些方法的优点在于,刺激物与中心注视点等距,并且在不需要选择效应器时(如更典型的情况,即反应是不同手指的按键操作),能够研究视觉选择和反应选择。其他研究人员也使用了类似的空间布局,但通过肢体或鼠标控制的光标进行定向运动,以单独或联合研究刺激识别、视觉搜索、空间刺激 - 反应兼容性、反应 - 效应兼容性以及练习/迁移的影响。我们系统地回顾了这些领域中包括视觉选择、反应选择和执行的研究,并研究了其结果对效应器选择作用的影响。此外,我们还表明,随着任务从简单向复杂转变,结果与一个基本的信息处理框架一致,在这个框架中,刺激识别和目标反应位置的选择与选择、规划并将效应器移动到目标位置是不同的。