• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索中的反应选择:非目标刺激反应兼容性的影响

Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.

作者信息

Starreveld Peter A, Theeuwes Jan, Mortier Karen

机构信息

Vrije Universiteit, Department of Cognitive Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):56-78. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.56.

DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.56
PMID:14769068
Abstract

The authors used visual search tasks in which components of the classic flanker task (B. A. Eriksen & C. W. Eriksen, 1974) were introduced. In several experiments the authors obtained evidence of parallel search for a target among distractor elements. Therefore, 2-stage models of visual search predict no effect of the identity of those distractors. However, clear compatibility effects of the distractors were obtained: Responses were faster when the distractors were compatible with the response than when they were incompatible. These results show that even in parallel search tasks identity information is extracted from the distractors. In addition, alternative interpretations of the results in terms of the occasional identification of a distractor before or after the target was identified could be ruled out. The results showed that flat search slopes obtained in visual search experiments provide no benchmark for preattentive processing.

摘要

作者使用了视觉搜索任务,其中引入了经典侧翼任务(B.A.埃里克森和C.W.埃里克森,1974)的组成部分。在几个实验中,作者获得了在干扰元素中并行搜索目标的证据。因此,视觉搜索的两阶段模型预测这些干扰物的身份不会产生影响。然而,获得了明显的干扰物兼容性效应:当干扰物与反应兼容时,反应比不兼容时更快。这些结果表明,即使在并行搜索任务中,身份信息也会从干扰物中提取。此外,可以排除根据在识别目标之前或之后偶尔识别干扰物对结果的其他解释。结果表明,视觉搜索实验中获得的平坦搜索斜率不能作为前注意加工的基准。

相似文献

1
Response selection in visual search: the influence of response compatibility of nontargets.视觉搜索中的反应选择:非目标刺激反应兼容性的影响
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):56-78. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.56.
2
When does visual attention select all features of a distractor?视觉注意力何时会选择干扰项的所有特征?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1452-64. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1452.
3
Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources.视觉搜索和双重任务揭示了两种不同的注意力资源。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jan-Feb;16(1):4-14. doi: 10.1162/089892904322755502.
4
Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.通过视觉搜索表现明确区分精神分裂症患者的前注意和注意过程。
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Jan 15;149(1-3):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Nov 21.
5
Do honeybees detect colour targets using serial or parallel visual search?蜜蜂是通过串行视觉搜索还是并行视觉搜索来检测颜色目标?
J Exp Biol. 2006 Mar;209(Pt 6):987-93. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02124.
6
Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models.用反应时间模型确定视觉特征搜索的子过程。
Psychol Res. 2003 May;67(2):80-105. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0109-2. Epub 2003 Mar 8.
7
Attentional selection and word processing in Stroop and word search tasks: the role of selection for action.在斯特鲁普任务和单词搜索任务中的注意选择与单词处理:为行动而选择的作用。
Am J Psychol. 1996 Summer;109(2):265-86.
8
[A deficit in preattentive processing of visual information in schizophrenic patients].[精神分裂症患者视觉信息的前注意加工缺陷]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2005;107(3):235-47.
9
Serial and parallel attentive visual searches: evidence from cumulative distribution functions of response times.串行和平行注意视觉搜索:来自反应时间累积分布函数的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Dec;34(6):1372-88. doi: 10.1037/a0011852.
10
Parallel processing in visual search asymmetry.视觉搜索不对称中的并行处理
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Feb;30(1):3-27. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.1.3.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.空间引导的视觉搜索中的分心物抑制。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;41(14):3180-3191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Extra-foveal Processing of Object Semantics Guides Early Overt Attention During Visual Search.物体语义的中央凹外加工在视觉搜索过程中引导早期显性注意。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Feb;82(2):655-670. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01906-1.
3
Response-level processing during visual feature search: Effects of frontoparietal activation and adult age.
视觉特征搜索过程中的反应水平加工:额顶叶激活与成年人年龄的影响
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):330-349. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01823-3.
4
Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.偶然学习通过降低反应阈值而不是提高效率来加速视觉搜索:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):90-112. doi: 10.1037/a0023894. Epub 2011 May 16.
5
THE PERVERSITY OF INANIMATE OBJECTS: STIMULUS CONTROL BY INCIDENTAL MUSICAL NOTATION.无生命物体的乖僻:附带乐谱的刺激控制
Soc Cogn. 2007 Apr;25(2):267-283. doi: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.267.
6
Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention?情境线索是否会引导注意力的分配?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):816-28. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.816.
7
Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?阅读的基本过程:视觉单词识别是必需的吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):119-24. doi: 10.3758/bf03196356.