Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 时期的听力学:英国听力学专家的实践和观点。

Audiology in the time of COVID-19: practices and opinions of audiologists in the UK.

机构信息

Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness (ManCAD), University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheshire, UK.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2021 Apr;60(4):255-262. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1814432. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To document changes in audiology practice resulting from COVID-19 restrictions and to assess audiologists' opinions about teleaudiology.

DESIGN

A survey consisting of closed-set and open-ended questions that assessed working practices during the COVID-19 restrictions and audiologists' attitudes towards teleaudiology.

SAMPLE

About 120 audiologists in the UK recruited via snowball sampling through social media and emails.

RESULTS

About 30% of respondents said they had used teleaudiology prior to COVID-19 restrictions; 98% had done at the time of survey completion, and 86% said they would continue to do so even when restrictions are lifted. Reasons for prior non-use of teleaudiology were associated with clinical limitations/needs, available infrastructure and patient preferences. Respondents believe teleaudiology will improve travel, convenience, flexibility and scheduling, that it will have little/no impact on satisfaction and quality of care, but that it will negatively impact personal interactions. Concerns about teleaudiology focussed on communication, inability to conduct some clinical procedures and technology.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents' experience with teleaudiology has generally been positive however improvements to infrastructure and training are necessary, and because many procedures must be conducted in-person, it will always be necessary to have hybrid-care pathways available.

摘要

目的

记录 COVID-19 限制对听力学实践的影响,并评估听力学家对远程听力学的看法。

设计

一项由封闭式和开放式问题组成的调查,评估 COVID-19 限制期间的工作实践以及听力学家对远程听力学的态度。

样本

通过社交媒体和电子邮件通过雪球抽样招募的英国约 120 名听力学家。

结果

约 30%的受访者表示,在 COVID-19 限制之前,他们曾使用过远程听力学;98%的人在调查完成时这样做,86%的人表示即使限制解除,他们也会继续这样做。以前不使用远程听力学的原因与临床限制/需求、可用基础设施和患者偏好有关。受访者认为远程听力学将改善旅行、便利、灵活性和日程安排,它对护理满意度和质量的影响很小/没有,但会对个人互动产生负面影响。对远程听力学的担忧集中在沟通、无法进行某些临床程序和技术上。

结论

受访者对远程听力学的经验总体上是积极的,然而,基础设施和培训的改善是必要的,而且由于许多程序必须亲自进行,因此始终有必要提供混合护理途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验