• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压患者的疗效和安全性的网状Meta 分析。

Network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.

机构信息

Department of Science, Tchaikapharma High Quality Medicines, Dimitrov Blvd.

Department of Informatics, New Bulgarian University, 21 Montevideo St, Sofia.

出版信息

Blood Press Monit. 2021 Apr 1;26(2):160-168. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000486.

DOI:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000486
PMID:32909966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7932752/
Abstract

Hypertension is a chronic condition leading to increased stress on the heart and blood vessels, a critical risk factor for clinically significant events such as myocardial infarction heart failure, stroke and death. Chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide are first-line antihypertensive agents for most patients with hypertension. The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of both therapies in patients with hypertension. Searches of electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycInfo and eLIBRARY.ru, were performed. We used network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence. Forest plots and closed loops depict estimated results from studies included in our meta-analysis. Of 1289 identified sources, only 37 were included in our meta-analysis. Our analysis has demonstrated a slight superiority for chlorthalidone regarding SBP and not statistically significant differences regarding DBP. Simultaneously, hydrochlorothiazide seems to be a safer choice of therapy, as evidenced by the levels of serum potassium. The two diuretics can be used interchangeably.

摘要

高血压是一种慢性疾病,会导致心脏和血管承受更大的压力,是心肌梗死、心力衰竭、中风和死亡等临床重大事件的关键危险因素。氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪是大多数高血压患者的一线降压药物。我们的荟萃分析旨在比较这两种治疗方法在高血压患者中的疗效和安全性。我们对电子数据库 PubMed、MEDLINE、Scopus、PsycInfo 和 eLIBRARY.ru 进行了检索。我们使用网络荟萃分析来结合直接和间接证据。森林图和闭合环描绘了我们荟萃分析中包含的研究的估计结果。在确定的 1289 个来源中,只有 37 个被纳入我们的荟萃分析。我们的分析表明,氯噻酮在收缩压方面略占优势,但在舒张压方面没有统计学上的显著差异。同时,氢氯噻嗪似乎是一种更安全的治疗选择,这可以从血清钾水平上得到证明。这两种利尿剂可以互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/41cf9c0581a1/bpmj-26-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/0e9876f38a3d/bpmj-26-160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/714d57a1eb2f/bpmj-26-160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/41cf9c0581a1/bpmj-26-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/0e9876f38a3d/bpmj-26-160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/714d57a1eb2f/bpmj-26-160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4359/7932752/41cf9c0581a1/bpmj-26-160-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Network meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients.氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压患者的疗效和安全性的网状Meta 分析。
Blood Press Monit. 2021 Apr 1;26(2):160-168. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000486.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide-meta-analysis.氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪的比较疗效和安全性-荟萃分析。
J Hum Hypertens. 2019 Nov;33(11):766-774. doi: 10.1038/s41371-019-0255-2. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
3
Efficacy of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with amiloride in multiple doses on blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension: a protocol for a factorial randomized controlled trial.氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪联合阿米洛利多剂量治疗原发性高血压患者的血压疗效:一项析因随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3909-z.
4
Race-Specific Comparisons of Antihypertensive and Metabolic Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone.氢氯噻嗪和氯噻酮的降压和代谢作用的种族特异性比较。
Am J Med. 2021 Jul;134(7):918-925.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.12.015. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Superior antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide.氯噻酮优于氢氯噻嗪的降压和心脏保护作用。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2021 Apr;57(4):291-301. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3266245.
6
Comparison of Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes of Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide to Treat Hypertension.比较氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压的心血管和安全性结局。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):542-551. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7454.
7
Chlorthalidone vs. Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-Cardiovascular Events.氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压及心血管事件的比较
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 29;387(26):2401-2410. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212270. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
8
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of monotherapy with thiazide diuretics for primary hypertension.噻嗪类利尿剂单药治疗原发性高血压的降压疗效。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;2014(5):CD003824. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003824.pub2.
9
Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Chlorthalidone: What Is the Difference?氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮:有何区别?
Circulation. 2022 Nov 29;146(22):1641-1643. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061029. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a hydrochlorothiazide to chlorthalidone medication change in veterans with hypertension.评估氢氯噻嗪转换为氯噻酮治疗高血压退伍军人的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2013 Sep;35(9):1423-30. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.430. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.老年人长期使用利尿剂的有效性和安全性:对近期发表的随机对照试验系统评价和荟萃分析的综合评价
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 May 25. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01229-5.
2
The Evolving Role of Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide as First-Line Treatments for Hypertensive Patients.氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪作为高血压患者一线治疗药物的角色演变
Cureus. 2024 Jul 4;16(7):e63841. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63841. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Thiazide diuretics are back in CKD: the case of chlorthalidone.
噻嗪类利尿剂在慢性肾脏病中再度应用:以氯噻酮为例。
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Sep 7;16(1):41-51. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac198. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Refractory Hypertension: a Narrative Systematic Review with Emphasis on Prognosis.难治性高血压:一项侧重于预后的叙述性系统评价
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2022 Apr;24(4):95-106. doi: 10.1007/s11906-022-01165-w. Epub 2022 Feb 2.