• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯噻酮优于氢氯噻嗪的降压和心脏保护作用。

Superior antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

INTEGRIS Baptist Medical Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

出版信息

Drugs Today (Barc). 2021 Apr;57(4):291-301. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3266245.

DOI:10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3266245
PMID:33851692
Abstract

Diuretics are the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of hypertension, either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive drugs. Of all diuretics, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and chlorthalidone (CTD) are the most commonly used, with HCTZ being the most widely prescribed diuretic. Recent studies have shown that CTD is a better diuretic with superior antihypertensive effectiveness and cardiovascular protection. Although these diuretics are chemically, pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically different, CTD continues to be called a "thiazide-like" diuretic. The only common features they both share are a sulfhydryl group in their molecules and their common mechanism and site of diuretic action. In order to get a better understanding of the true pharmacologic actions as well as the benefits and risks of these diuretics, a MEDLINE search of the English language literature between 1964 and January 2021 was conducted, using the terms "diuretics", "hydrochlorothiazide", "chlorthalidone", "hypertension", "cardiovascular disease" and "treatment". From this search, 28 pertinent papers were selected and they will be discussed in this review together with collateral literature. The analysis of results revealed that CTD is superior to HCTZ in antihypertensive effectiveness and cardioprotection and should be the preferred diuretic for the treatment of hypertension.

摘要

利尿剂是治疗高血压最常用的药物,无论是单独使用还是与其他降压药物联合使用。在所有利尿剂中,氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)和氯噻酮(CTD)是最常用的,其中 HCTZ 是最广泛使用的利尿剂。最近的研究表明,CTD 是一种更好的利尿剂,具有更好的降压效果和心血管保护作用。尽管这些利尿剂在化学、药代动力学和药效动力学上有所不同,但 CTD 仍被称为“噻嗪类”利尿剂。它们唯一的共同特征是分子中的巯基以及它们共同的利尿作用机制和部位。为了更好地了解这些利尿剂的真正药理作用以及它们的益处和风险,我们对 1964 年至 2021 年 1 月期间的英语文献进行了 MEDLINE 搜索,使用的术语有“利尿剂”、“氢氯噻嗪”、“氯噻酮”、“高血压”、“心血管疾病”和“治疗”。从这次搜索中,我们选择了 28 篇相关论文,并将在这篇综述中与相关文献一起进行讨论。结果分析表明,CTD 在降压效果和心脏保护方面优于 HCTZ,应该是治疗高血压的首选利尿剂。

相似文献

1
Superior antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of chlorthalidone compared with hydrochlorothiazide.氯噻酮优于氢氯噻嗪的降压和心脏保护作用。
Drugs Today (Barc). 2021 Apr;57(4):291-301. doi: 10.1358/dot.2021.57.4.3266245.
2
Comparison of new-onset gout in adults prescribed chlorthalidone vs. hydrochlorothiazide for hypertension.比较氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压成人中新发痛风的情况。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Dec;16(12):864-8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12413. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
3
Hydrochlorothiazide versus chlorthalidone in the management of hypertension.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮治疗高血压的比较。
Cardiol Rev. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):51-6. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181c61b52.
4
Chlorthalidone reduces cardiovascular events compared with hydrochlorothiazide: a retrospective cohort analysis.氯噻酮比氢氯噻嗪更能降低心血管事件:一项回顾性队列分析。
Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):689-94. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.161505. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
5
Efficacy of chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide in combination with amiloride in multiple doses on blood pressure in patients with primary hypertension: a protocol for a factorial randomized controlled trial.氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪联合阿米洛利多剂量治疗原发性高血压患者的血压疗效:一项析因随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 16;20(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3909-z.
6
Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide for Hypertension-CV Events: Did the Design Influence the Outcome?氯噻酮与氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压-CV 事件:设计是否影响结果?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2023 Oct;71(10):93. doi: 10.59556/japi.71.0328.
7
Efficacy of Low-Dose Chlorthalidone and Hydrochlorothiazide as Assessed by 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.24 小时动态血压监测评估小剂量氯噻酮和氢氯噻嗪的疗效。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 2;67(4):379-389. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.083.
8
Hydrochlorothiazide vs chlorthalidone, indapamide, and potassium-sparing/hydrochlorothiazide diuretics for reducing left ventricular hypertrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氢氯噻嗪与氯噻酮、吲达帕胺和保钾/氢氯噻嗪利尿剂降低左心室肥厚的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Oct;20(10):1507-1515. doi: 10.1111/jch.13386. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
9
Comparison of thiazide-like diuretics versus thiazide-type diuretics: a meta-analysis.噻嗪样利尿剂与噻嗪类利尿剂的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Nov;21(11):2634-2642. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13205. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Evidence-based diuretics: focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide.循证利尿剂:聚焦氯噻酮和吲达帕胺
Future Cardiol. 2015 Mar;11(2):203-17. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.83.