• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提供者对积极发展筛查的反应:转诊实践中的差异?

Provider Responses to Positive Developmental Screening: Disparities in Referral Practices?

机构信息

Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;42(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000855.

DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000855
PMID:32909974
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend universal screening for developmental concerns in young children in pediatric primary care, with referral to early intervention (EI) as early as possible for children with a positive screen. However, participation in EI differs by child race, ethnicity, language, and sex. This study evaluated disparities in rates of referral to EI and estimated the factors associated with referral before and immediately after a positive developmental screen.

METHODS

Children seen in a large primary care network that has implemented universal developmental screening were included if they screened positive on the Survey of Well-being of Young Children (SWYC) Milestones during a 16- to 30-month well-child visit (n = 7358). Demographics, screening results, and referrals were extracted from the electronic health record.

RESULTS

Among children who screened positive, 17.5% were already in EI, and 39.9% were referred to EI during the visit with positive screen; 42.5% were not referred. In adjusted regression, the following factors were associated with being in EI before the positive screen: lower SWYC score and being male, older, and White. The following factors were associated with new referral to EI during a visit with positive SWYC: having lower SWYC score or lower income and being male, older, and Black race.

CONCLUSION

The finding that White children were more likely referred before developmental screening and non-White children more likely referred at the time of positive screen suggests that screening decreases disparities by increasing referral for children with developmental delays from traditionally underserved backgrounds.

摘要

目的

指南建议在儿科初级保健中对幼儿的发育问题进行普遍筛查,如果筛查结果阳性,应尽快将儿童转介至早期干预(EI)。然而,儿童的种族、民族、语言和性别等因素会影响其参与 EI 的程度。本研究评估了在接受 EI 转介方面的差异,并估计了在阳性发育筛查前后与转介相关的因素。

方法

在实施了普遍发育筛查的大型初级保健网络中,如果儿童在 16 至 30 个月的常规儿童保健就诊时在幼儿福祉调查(SWYC)里程碑中筛查阳性(n=7358),则将其纳入研究。从电子健康记录中提取人口统计学资料、筛查结果和转介情况。

结果

在筛查阳性的儿童中,17.5%已经在接受 EI,39.9%在阳性筛查就诊时被转介至 EI;42.5%未被转介。在调整后的回归分析中,以下因素与在阳性筛查前已在 EI 中有关:SWYC 评分较低且为男性、年龄较大、为白人。以下因素与在阳性 SWYC 就诊时新转介至 EI 有关:SWYC 评分或收入较低且为男性、年龄较大、为黑人。

结论

白人儿童在发育筛查前更有可能被转介,而非白人儿童在阳性筛查时更有可能被转介,这表明筛查通过增加对来自传统服务不足背景的发育迟缓儿童的转介,减少了差异。

相似文献

1
Provider Responses to Positive Developmental Screening: Disparities in Referral Practices?提供者对积极发展筛查的反应:转诊实践中的差异?
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2021 Jan 1;42(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000855.
2
Adherence to screening and referral guidelines for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers in pediatric primary care.在儿科初级保健中,坚持对幼儿自闭症谱系障碍进行筛查和转介的指导原则。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232335. eCollection 2020.
3
Child characteristics and early intervention referral and receipt of services: a retrospective cohort study.儿童特征与早期干预转介及服务获取:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1965-x.
4
Factors associated with early intervention referral and evaluation: a mixed methods analysis.与早期干预转诊及评估相关的因素:一项混合方法分析
Acad Pediatr. 2014 May-Jun;14(3):315-23. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.01.007.
5
Improving developmental screening documentation and referral completion.改善发育筛查文件记录和转介完成情况。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e1181-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1151. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
Early Intervention Referral Outcomes for Children at Increased Risk of Experiencing Developmental Delays.早期干预转介对有发展迟缓风险儿童的效果。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Feb;24(2):204-212. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02830-4.
7
Comparative Accuracy of Developmental Screening Questionnaires.发育筛查问卷的比较准确性。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Apr 1;174(4):366-374. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6000.
8
Effectiveness of developmental screening in an urban setting.发育筛查在城市环境中的效果。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):30-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0765. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
9
Parents' Concerns Are Associated with Early Intervention Evaluation and Eligibility Outcomes.家长的关注点与早期干预评估和资格认定结果相关。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;43(3):e145-e152. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001003. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
10
Predictors of Early Intervention Referral after a Positive Developmental Screen in Community Primary Care Clinics.社区基层医疗诊所发育筛查呈阳性后早期干预转诊的预测因素
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Apr;25(3):102591. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Consensus recommendations for usability and acceptability of mobile health autism screening tools.移动健康自闭症筛查工具的可用性和可接受性共识建议。
Autism. 2025 Aug 12:13623613251360276. doi: 10.1177/13623613251360276.
2
Sensitivity and Specificity of Developmental Surveillance and Autism Screening in an Australian Multicultural Cohort: The Watch Me Grow Study.澳大利亚多元文化队列中发育监测与自闭症筛查的敏感性和特异性:“关注我成长”研究
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06859-z.
3
Center-Based Childcare Access to Health Screenings and Developmental Assessments in U.S. Children from Birth to Five.
美国从出生到五岁儿童在基于中心的儿童保育机构接受健康筛查和发育评估的情况
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Jan;29(1):67-77. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-04028-9. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
4
Parent Reports of Developmental Service Utilization After Newborn Screening.新生儿筛查后家长对发育服务利用情况的报告。
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Dec 31;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/ijns11010003.
5
Survey of the Landscape of Society Practice Guidelines for Genetic Testing of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.神经发育障碍基因检测社会实践指南的现状调查。
Ann Neurol. 2024 Nov;96(5):900-913. doi: 10.1002/ana.27045. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
6
Standardizing and Improving Primary Care-Based Electronic Developmental Screening for Young Children in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics.规范和改进联邦合格健康中心诊所中基于初级保健的幼儿电子发育筛查。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Oct;28(10):1716-1725. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03970-y. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
7
"Everyone screens to some extent": Barriers and facilitators of developmental screening among children with sickle cell disease: A mixed methods study.“每个人都在一定程度上进行筛查”:镰状细胞病患儿发育筛查的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Aug;71(8):e31060. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31060. Epub 2024 May 17.
8
Caregiver Experience with Bicultural, Bilingual Family Navigators to Support Early Childhood Development.照顾者对具有多元文化和双语家庭导航员的体验,以支持儿童早期发展。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Aug;26(4):711-717. doi: 10.1007/s10903-024-01591-9. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
9
Place-Based Child Opportunity at Birth and Child Development from Infancy to Age 4.出生时的基于地点的儿童机会与儿童从婴儿期到 4 岁的发展。
J Pediatr. 2024 Apr;267:113909. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113909. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Equity Concerns Across Pediatric Research Recruitment: An Analysis of Research Staff Interviews.儿科研究招募中的公平性问题:研究人员访谈分析
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Mar;24(2):318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.06.032. Epub 2023 Jul 11.