Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232335. eCollection 2020.
Although the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) for all young children, disparities in ASD diagnosis and intervention in minority children persist. One potential contributor to disparities could be whether physicians take different actions after an initial positive screen based on patient demographics. This study estimated factors associated with physicians completing the follow-up interview for the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers with Follow-up (M-CHAT-F), and referring children to diagnostic services, audiology, and Early Intervention (EI) immediately after a positive screen.
Children seen in a large primary care network that has implemented universal ASD screening were included if they screened positive on the M-CHAT parent questionnaire during a 16-30 month well child visit (N = 2882). Demographics, screening results, and referrals were extracted from the electronic health record.
Children from lower-income families or on public insurance were more likely to have been administered the follow-up interview. Among children who screened positive, 26% were already in EI, 31% were newly referred to EI, 11% were referred each to audiology and for comprehensive ASD evaluation. 40.2% received at least one recommended referral; 3.7% received all recommended referrals. In adjusted multivariable models, male sex, white versus black race, living in an English-speaking household, and having public insurance were associated with new EI referral. Male sex, black versus white race, and lower household income were associated with referral to audiology. Being from an English-speaking family, white versus Asian race, and lower household income were associated with referral for ASD evaluation. A concurrent positive screen for general developmental concerns was associated with each referral.
We found low rates of follow-up interview completion and referral after positive ASD screen, with variations in referral by sex, language, socio-economic status, and race. Understanding pediatrician decision-making about ASD screening is critical to improving care and reducing disparities.
尽管美国儿科学会建议对所有幼儿进行自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)筛查,但少数民族儿童的 ASD 诊断和干预方面仍存在差异。导致这种差异的一个潜在因素可能是医生在根据患者人口统计学数据进行初始阳性筛查后,是否会采取不同的行动。本研究估计了与医生完成《自闭症幼儿改良检查表随访版》(M-CHAT-F)随访访谈以及在阳性筛查后立即将儿童转介至诊断服务、听力学和早期干预(EI)相关的因素。
在实施了普遍 ASD 筛查的大型初级保健网络中,如果儿童在 16-30 个月的健康儿童就诊期间,M-CHAT 家长问卷筛查呈阳性(N=2882),则将其纳入研究。从电子健康记录中提取人口统计学数据、筛查结果和转介情况。
来自低收入家庭或享受公共保险的儿童更有可能接受随访访谈。在筛查呈阳性的儿童中,26%已经在接受 EI 服务,31%新被转介至 EI,11%同时被转介至听力学和全面 ASD 评估。40.2%接受了至少一项推荐的转介;3.7%接受了所有推荐的转介。在调整后的多变量模型中,男性性别、白种人而非黑种人、居住在讲英语的家庭以及享受公共保险与新的 EI 转介相关。男性性别、黑种人而非白种人、较低的家庭收入与转介至听力学相关。来自讲英语的家庭、白种人而非亚洲种族以及较低的家庭收入与 ASD 评估的转介相关。同时存在一般发育问题的阳性筛查与每一项转介均相关。
我们发现,在 ASD 阳性筛查后,完成随访访谈和转介的比例较低,并且在性别、语言、社会经济地位和种族方面存在转介差异。了解儿科医生在 ASD 筛查方面的决策对于改善护理和减少差异至关重要。