Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Transcare Transdisciplinary Pain Management Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Dec;43(4):347-354. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000433.
Two factors related to the continuation of persistent pain are pain catastrophizing and illness perceptions. Pain neuroscience education is known to positively influence both in patients with persistent pain. As the integration of pain neuroscience education in monodisciplinary physiotherapy treatments is effective, integration in transdisciplinary cognitive-behavioral treatments seems recommendable. When doing so, the moderating effect of pain catastrophizing and perceptions on treatment results have to be examined, as these provide valuable information under which conditions treatment works. A bottom-up retrospective observational study evaluated the changes in clinical outcomes, and relationships between clinical outcomes and cognitive and emotional factors in patients with persistent pain. Multiple regression analysis, PROCESS macro, explored the moderating effects of pain catastrophizing on the relationship between illness perceptions and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization. In total, 78 patients were included in the study. A correlation between pretreatment scores and change scores in illness perceptions and self-reported symptoms of central sensitization following treatment were found (resp. R-sq 0.407, F(10,99) = 0.638, P = 0.000; R-sq 0.361, F(5, 54) = 0.609, P = 0.000; and R-sq 0.314, F(4,55) = 0.560, P = 0.00), however, moderation of pain catastrophizing scores on these correlations was not found. Even though an association between changes in pain catastrophizing and illness perceptions in patients with persistent pain was found, the direction or strength between the changes in illness perceptions and changes in self-reported symptoms of central sensitization was not influenced by pretreatment scores of pain catastrophizing.
两种与持续性疼痛持续相关的因素是疼痛灾难化和疾病认知。疼痛神经科学教育被认为可以积极影响持续性疼痛患者的这两个方面。由于疼痛神经科学教育在单一学科物理治疗中的整合是有效的,因此在跨学科认知行为治疗中的整合似乎是值得推荐的。在这样做时,必须检查疼痛灾难化和认知的调节作用对治疗结果的影响,因为这些为治疗在何种条件下有效提供了有价值的信息。一项自下而上的回顾性观察研究评估了持续性疼痛患者的临床结果变化,以及临床结果与认知和情绪因素之间的关系。多元回归分析、PROCESS 宏,探索了疼痛灾难化对疾病认知与自我报告的中枢敏化症状之间关系的调节作用。共有 78 名患者纳入研究。在治疗前后,疾病认知和自我报告的中枢敏化症状的治疗前评分和变化评分之间发现了相关性(分别为 R-sq 0.407,F(10,99) = 0.638,P = 0.000;R-sq 0.361,F(5,54) = 0.609,P = 0.000;和 R-sq 0.314,F(4,55) = 0.560,P = 0.00),但是,疼痛灾难化评分对这些相关性没有调节作用。尽管在持续性疼痛患者中发现了疼痛灾难化和疾病认知变化之间的关联,但疾病认知变化与自我报告的中枢敏化症状变化之间的方向或强度不受疼痛灾难化治疗前评分的影响。