Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):43-60. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13225.
In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) including once-weekly (QW) formulations have been incorporated into type 2 diabetes (T2D) clinical guidelines, making it essential that pharmacists and healthcare professionals (HCPs) have a clear understanding of their safety profiles. Currently, three QW GLP-1 RAs are approved and marketed in the United States for the treatment of T2D: dulaglutide, exenatide extended-release and semaglutide. This review provides pharmacists and HCPs with collated data related to potential safety and tolerability issues when patients use QW GLP-1 RAs, enabling patient education and treatment optimization.
This is a narrative review comparing the safety and tolerability of the three QW GLP-1 RAs, using data from Phase 3 clinical trials. Extracted safety data included gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs), hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, pancreatitis, neoplasms, gallbladder events, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and/or its complications (DRCs).
A total of 30 trials were identified for inclusion; eight were head-to-head trials involving another GLP-1 RA; of these, six compared GLP-1 RAs with different dosing regimens (QW vs once-daily or twice-daily), and two were direct QW vs QW GLP-1 RA comparisons. The most commonly reported AEs were GI events (notably nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea), but there was variation between the three QW drugs. These were generally mild-to-moderate in severity and transient. Risk of hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, pancreatitis, neoplasms and gallbladder events was generally low across the GLP-1 RAs investigated. Overall rates of DR or DRC were low across the trials. Only in one trial (SUSTAIN 6) there were significantly more DRC events reported in patients treated with QW semaglutide (3.0%) compared with placebo (1.8%). This was likely due to the rapid improvement in glucose control in patients with pre-existing DR enrolled within that trial.
This review puts the latest clinical data from the marketed QW GLP-1 RAs into context with results from older Phase 3 trials, to enable pharmacists and HCPs to make informed treatment decisions. Each of the three QW GLP-1 RAs has their own safety profile, which should be considered when choosing the optimal treatment for patients.
近年来,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)包括每周一次(QW)制剂已被纳入 2 型糖尿病(T2D)临床指南,因此药剂师和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)必须清楚了解其安全性。目前,美国有三种 QW GLP-1 RA 被批准用于治疗 T2D:度拉糖肽、艾塞那肽延长释放和司美格鲁肽。本综述为药剂师和 HCPs 提供了与患者使用 QW GLP-1 RA 时潜在安全性和耐受性问题相关的综合数据,使患者能够接受教育并优化治疗。
这是一篇比较三种 QW GLP-1 RA 的安全性和耐受性的叙述性综述,使用了来自 3 期临床试验的数据。提取的安全性数据包括胃肠道(GI)不良事件(AE)、低血糖、注射部位反应、胰腺炎、肿瘤、胆囊事件以及糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)及其并发症(DRC)。
共确定了 30 项纳入的试验;其中 8 项为头对头试验,涉及另一种 GLP-1 RA;其中 6 项比较了 GLP-1 RA 不同的给药方案(QW 与每日一次或每日两次),2 项为直接 QW 与 QW GLP-1 RA 的比较。最常见的报告 AE 是 GI 事件(特别是恶心、呕吐和腹泻),但三种 QW 药物之间存在差异。这些通常是轻度至中度,且是短暂的。在研究的 GLP-1 RA 中,低血糖、注射部位反应、胰腺炎、肿瘤和胆囊事件的风险通常较低。总体 DR 或 DRC 发生率在试验中较低。只有在一项试验(SUSTAIN 6)中,接受 QW 司美格鲁肽治疗的患者(3.0%)报告的 DRC 事件明显多于安慰剂(1.8%)。这可能是由于该试验中入组的有预先存在的 DR 的患者血糖控制迅速改善所致。
本综述将最新的临床数据与旧的 3 期试验结果结合起来,以便药剂师和 HCPs 能够做出明智的治疗决策。三种 QW GLP-1 RA 各有其安全性特征,在为患者选择最佳治疗方案时应予以考虑。