Suppr超能文献

GLP-1 受体激动剂每周一次给药治疗 2 型糖尿病的安全性和耐受性。

Safety and tolerability of once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2020 Sep;45 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):43-60. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13225.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

In recent years, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) including once-weekly (QW) formulations have been incorporated into type 2 diabetes (T2D) clinical guidelines, making it essential that pharmacists and healthcare professionals (HCPs) have a clear understanding of their safety profiles. Currently, three QW GLP-1 RAs are approved and marketed in the United States for the treatment of T2D: dulaglutide, exenatide extended-release and semaglutide. This review provides pharmacists and HCPs with collated data related to potential safety and tolerability issues when patients use QW GLP-1 RAs, enabling patient education and treatment optimization.

METHODS

This is a narrative review comparing the safety and tolerability of the three QW GLP-1 RAs, using data from Phase 3 clinical trials. Extracted safety data included gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs), hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, pancreatitis, neoplasms, gallbladder events, and diabetic retinopathy (DR) and/or its complications (DRCs).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 30 trials were identified for inclusion; eight were head-to-head trials involving another GLP-1 RA; of these, six compared GLP-1 RAs with different dosing regimens (QW vs once-daily or twice-daily), and two were direct QW vs QW GLP-1 RA comparisons. The most commonly reported AEs were GI events (notably nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea), but there was variation between the three QW drugs. These were generally mild-to-moderate in severity and transient. Risk of hypoglycaemia, injection-site reactions, pancreatitis, neoplasms and gallbladder events was generally low across the GLP-1 RAs investigated. Overall rates of DR or DRC were low across the trials. Only in one trial (SUSTAIN 6) there were significantly more DRC events reported in patients treated with QW semaglutide (3.0%) compared with placebo (1.8%). This was likely due to the rapid improvement in glucose control in patients with pre-existing DR enrolled within that trial.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This review puts the latest clinical data from the marketed QW GLP-1 RAs into context with results from older Phase 3 trials, to enable pharmacists and HCPs to make informed treatment decisions. Each of the three QW GLP-1 RAs has their own safety profile, which should be considered when choosing the optimal treatment for patients.

摘要

已知和目的

近年来,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)包括每周一次(QW)制剂已被纳入 2 型糖尿病(T2D)临床指南,因此药剂师和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)必须清楚了解其安全性。目前,美国有三种 QW GLP-1 RA 被批准用于治疗 T2D:度拉糖肽、艾塞那肽延长释放和司美格鲁肽。本综述为药剂师和 HCPs 提供了与患者使用 QW GLP-1 RA 时潜在安全性和耐受性问题相关的综合数据,使患者能够接受教育并优化治疗。

方法

这是一篇比较三种 QW GLP-1 RA 的安全性和耐受性的叙述性综述,使用了来自 3 期临床试验的数据。提取的安全性数据包括胃肠道(GI)不良事件(AE)、低血糖、注射部位反应、胰腺炎、肿瘤、胆囊事件以及糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)及其并发症(DRC)。

结果和讨论

共确定了 30 项纳入的试验;其中 8 项为头对头试验,涉及另一种 GLP-1 RA;其中 6 项比较了 GLP-1 RA 不同的给药方案(QW 与每日一次或每日两次),2 项为直接 QW 与 QW GLP-1 RA 的比较。最常见的报告 AE 是 GI 事件(特别是恶心、呕吐和腹泻),但三种 QW 药物之间存在差异。这些通常是轻度至中度,且是短暂的。在研究的 GLP-1 RA 中,低血糖、注射部位反应、胰腺炎、肿瘤和胆囊事件的风险通常较低。总体 DR 或 DRC 发生率在试验中较低。只有在一项试验(SUSTAIN 6)中,接受 QW 司美格鲁肽治疗的患者(3.0%)报告的 DRC 事件明显多于安慰剂(1.8%)。这可能是由于该试验中入组的有预先存在的 DR 的患者血糖控制迅速改善所致。

新内容和结论

本综述将最新的临床数据与旧的 3 期试验结果结合起来,以便药剂师和 HCPs 能够做出明智的治疗决策。三种 QW GLP-1 RA 各有其安全性特征,在为患者选择最佳治疗方案时应予以考虑。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Introduction: .引言:.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S1-S2. doi: 10.2337/dc20-Sint.
7
Liraglutide in Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes.利拉鲁肽治疗 2 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者的疗效
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):637-646. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903822. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验