• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼日利亚患者经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检中,前列腺尖周神经阻滞与直肠内利多卡因凝胶的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Apical peri-prostatic nerve block versus intra-rectal xylocaine gel for trans- rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy among Nigerian patients: A prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Ezenwa E V, Osaghae S O, Ozah E O, Okparanta G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria.

Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Benin Teaching Hospital; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Benin, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;23(9):1183-1187. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_219_19.

DOI:10.4103/njcp.njcp_219_19
PMID:32913154
Abstract

AIMS

This study compared the analgesic effect of apical peri-prostatic block with that of intra-rectal xylocaine gel for trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PBx) in Nigeria.

METHODS

This is a prospective randomized comparative study carried out over one year in University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Edo State, Nigeria. The participants were randomized into two groups; Group A had 10 mls of intra-rectal xylocaine gel instillation while Group B had apical infiltration of 10 mls of 1% xylocaine all before TRUS-PBx.

RESULT

There was a statistically significant difference in the mean pain score during and one hour after TRUS-PBx between Group A and Group B of the study population respectively (p < 0.0001). Those that had intra-rectal xylocaine gel (Group A) had more pain during and after biopsy. There was no difference in the mean pain score during probe insertion between the two groups (p = 0.952).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the superiority of apical peri-prostatic nerve block over intra rectal xylocaine gel instillation during TRUS-PBx with respect to its anesthetic efficacy. Therefore, centers providing TRUS-PBx in Nigeria should consider apical peri-prostatic nerve block as their mode of anesthesia for the procedure due to its efficacy and high safety profile.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了尼日利亚经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检(TRUS-PBx)时前列腺尖周阻滞与直肠内注入利多卡因凝胶的镇痛效果。

方法

这是一项在尼日利亚江户州贝宁大学教学医院进行的为期一年的前瞻性随机对照研究。参与者被随机分为两组;A组在TRUS-PBx前直肠内注入10毫升利多卡因凝胶,B组在TRUS-PBx前在前列腺尖部浸润10毫升1%利多卡因。

结果

研究人群中,A组和B组在TRUS-PBx期间及之后1小时的平均疼痛评分分别存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.0001)。直肠内注入利多卡因凝胶的患者(A组)在活检期间及之后疼痛更明显。两组在探头插入期间的平均疼痛评分无差异(p = 0.952)。

结论

本研究表明,在TRUS-PBx过程中,前列腺尖周神经阻滞在麻醉效果方面优于直肠内注入利多卡因凝胶。因此,尼日利亚提供TRUS-PBx的中心应考虑将前列腺尖周神经阻滞作为该手术的麻醉方式,因其效果良好且安全性高。

相似文献

1
Apical peri-prostatic nerve block versus intra-rectal xylocaine gel for trans- rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy among Nigerian patients: A prospective randomized study.尼日利亚患者经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检中,前列腺尖周神经阻滞与直肠内利多卡因凝胶的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;23(9):1183-1187. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_219_19.
2
Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in university of Benin teaching hospital: effect of prostate volume on pain amongst Nigerian patients.贝宁大学教学医院经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检:尼日利亚患者中前列腺体积对疼痛的影响
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2021 Feb 15;9(1):157-162. eCollection 2021.
3
Combined intrarectal lidocaine gel and periprostatic nerve block: A 'balanced' anaesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy?直肠内利多卡因凝胶联合前列腺周围神经阻滞:经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检的“平衡”麻醉?
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2018 Oct-Dec;25(4):252-256. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_145_18.
4
Comparison of different local anesthesia techniques during TRUS-guided biopsies: a prospective pilot study.经直肠超声引导下活检时不同局部麻醉技术的比较:一项前瞻性初步研究。
Urology. 2005 Jan;65(1):109-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.013.
5
Periprostatic nerve block alone versus combined with perineal pudendal nerve block or intrarectal local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中单纯前列腺周神经阻滞与联合会阴阴部神经阻滞或直肠内局部麻醉的效果比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):833-838. doi: 10.1111/iju.14036. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
6
Anorectal application of 5% lidocaine cream reduces pain prior to periprostatic nerve block during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: Randomized, prospective controlled study.直肠内应用 5%利多卡因乳膏可减轻经直肠超声引导前列腺活检前前列腺周围神经阻滞时的疼痛:随机、前瞻性对照研究。
Scand J Urol. 2021 Apr;55(2):149-154. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2021.1885484. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
The effectivity of periprostatic nerve blockade for the pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中前列腺周围神经阻滞对疼痛控制的有效性。
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Jun 24;85(2):69-72. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.2.69.
8
Unilateral pudendal nerve blockade for relief of all pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中单侧阴部神经阻滞缓解所有疼痛的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):528-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.033.
9
Site of local anaesthesia in transrectal ultrasonography-guided 12-core prostate biopsy: does it make a difference?经直肠超声引导下12针前列腺穿刺活检的局部麻醉部位:有区别吗?
BJU Int. 2006 Feb;97(2):263-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05957.x.
10
Lidocaine-prilocaine administration during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial.经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检术中利多卡因-丙胺卡因给药:一项随机、单盲、安慰剂对照试验。
J Endourol. 2006 Jul;20(7):525-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.525.

引用本文的文献

1
Setting priorities for ageing research in Africa: A systematic mapping review of 512 studies from sub-Saharan Africa.设定非洲老龄化研究重点:对撒哈拉以南非洲 512 项研究的系统综述
J Glob Health. 2021 Jun 26;11:15002. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.15002. eCollection 2021.
2
Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in university of Benin teaching hospital: effect of prostate volume on pain amongst Nigerian patients.贝宁大学教学医院经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检:尼日利亚患者中前列腺体积对疼痛的影响
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2021 Feb 15;9(1):157-162. eCollection 2021.