Suppr超能文献

经直肠超声引导前列腺穿刺活检中单纯前列腺周神经阻滞与联合会阴阴部神经阻滞或直肠内局部麻醉的效果比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Periprostatic nerve block alone versus combined with perineal pudendal nerve block or intrarectal local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yuzuncu Yil University Medical Faculty, Van, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):833-838. doi: 10.1111/iju.14036. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy, safety and cost of combinations of perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block and intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block with the standard technique (periprostatic nerve block).

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized prospective controlled trial. Patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen values (prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/mL) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were included in the study. Patients with anorectal diseases, chronic prostatitis, previous history of prostate biopsy and anorectal surgery were excluded from the study. A total of 148 patients (group 1 [periprostatic nerve block], n = 48; group 2 [intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block], n = 51; group 3 [perineal pudendal nerve block + periprostatic nerve block], n = 49) were included in the final analysis. Pain during insertion and manipulation of the transrectal ultrasound probe was recorded as visual analog scale 1, pain during penetration of the biopsy needle into the prostate and sampling was recorded as visual analog scale 2, and pain during the entire procedure recorded as visual analog scale 3.

RESULTS

The mean visual analog scale 1 score was significantly lower in group 3, when compared with group 1 and group 2 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the mean visual analog scale 2 score. The mean visual analog scale 3 score was significantly lower in group 3 when compared with other groups (P < 0.001). The total cost for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in the intrarectal local anesthesia + periprostatic nerve block group was significantly higher than the other two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of perineal pudendal nerve block and periprostatic nerve block provides more effective pain control than intrarectal local anesthesia plus periprostatic nerve block and periprostatic nerve block alone, with similar complication rates and without increasing cost.

摘要

目的

比较会阴阴部神经阻滞+前列腺周围神经阻滞与直肠内局部麻醉+前列腺周围神经阻滞联合标准技术(前列腺周围神经阻滞)的疗效、安全性和成本。

方法

本研究设计为随机前瞻性对照试验。纳入血清前列腺特异性抗原值升高(前列腺特异性抗原≥4ng/mL)和/或直肠指检异常的患者。排除患有肛肠疾病、慢性前列腺炎、前列腺活检和肛肠手术史的患者。共有 148 名患者(第 1 组[前列腺周围神经阻滞],n=48;第 2 组[直肠内局部麻醉+前列腺周围神经阻滞],n=51;第 3 组[会阴阴部神经阻滞+前列腺周围神经阻滞],n=49)纳入最终分析。记录经直肠超声探头插入和操作时的疼痛为视觉模拟量表 1,记录活检针穿透前列腺和取样时的疼痛为视觉模拟量表 2,记录整个过程中的疼痛为视觉模拟量表 3。

结果

第 3 组的平均视觉模拟量表 1 评分明显低于第 1 组和第 2 组(P<0.001)。第 2 组之间的平均视觉模拟量表 2 评分无显著差异。与其他组相比,第 3 组的平均视觉模拟量表 3 评分明显较低(P<0.001)。直肠内局部麻醉+前列腺周围神经阻滞组的经直肠超声引导活检总费用明显高于其他两组。

结论

会阴阴部神经阻滞联合前列腺周围神经阻滞比直肠内局部麻醉加前列腺周围神经阻滞和单纯前列腺周围神经阻滞更能有效控制疼痛,且并发症发生率相似,成本无增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验