Schenk Nathalie, Zimmermann Ronan, Fürer Lukas, Krause Mariane, Weise Sindy, Kaess Michael, Schlüter-Müller Susanne, Schmeck Klaus
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Research Department, Psychiatric University Hospitals, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Psychology School, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Res Psychother. 2019 Jul 30;22(2):348. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2019.348. eCollection 2019 Aug 9.
Jeremy Safran and his research group suggest that rupture-repair processes are important for the therapeutic change in patients with personality disorders. In this exploratory study, we describe alliance ruptures and resolutions on a session-by-session basis in a clinical sample of adolescents with Borderline Personality Pathology (BPP). Three research questions are addressed: i) Is there a typical trajectory of alliance ruptures over treatment time? ii) Which rupture and resolution markers occur frequently? iii) Which rupture markers are most significant for the therapeutic alliance? Ten patients who presented with identity diffusion and at least three Borderline Personality Disorder criteria were studied and treated with Adolescent Identity Treatment. Alliance ruptures and resolutions were coded in 187 therapy sessions according to the Rupture Resolution Rating System. Mixed-effect models were used for statistical analyses. Findings supported an inverted U-shaped trajectory of alliance ruptures across treatment time. The inspection of individual trajectories displayed that alliance ruptures emerge non-linearly with particular significant alliance ruptures appearing in phases or single peak sessions. Withdrawal rupture markers emerged more often compared to confrontation markers. However, confrontation markers inflicted a higher impact or strain on the immediate collaboration between patient and therapist compared to withdrawal markers. Clinicians should expect alliance ruptures to occur frequently in the treatment of adolescents with BPP. The findings support the theory of a dynamic therapeutic alliance characterised by a continuous negotiation between patients and therapists.
杰里米·萨夫兰及其研究团队指出,破裂-修复过程对于人格障碍患者的治疗改变至关重要。在这项探索性研究中,我们逐 session 描述了患有边缘型人格病理学(BPP)的青少年临床样本中的联盟破裂与解决情况。探讨了三个研究问题:i)治疗过程中联盟破裂是否存在典型轨迹?ii)哪些破裂和解决标记频繁出现?iii)哪些破裂标记对治疗联盟最为重要?对 10 名表现出身份认同扩散且至少符合三项边缘型人格障碍标准的患者进行了研究,并采用青少年身份治疗法进行治疗。根据破裂解决评分系统,对 187 次治疗 session 中的联盟破裂与解决情况进行了编码。采用混合效应模型进行统计分析。研究结果支持治疗过程中联盟破裂呈倒 U 形轨迹。对个体轨迹的检查显示,联盟破裂呈非线性出现,在某些阶段或单峰 session 中会出现特别显著的联盟破裂。与对抗标记相比,退缩破裂标记出现得更频繁。然而,与退缩标记相比,对抗标记对患者与治疗师之间的即时合作造成的影响或压力更大。临床医生应预计在治疗患有 BPP 的青少年时联盟破裂会频繁发生。研究结果支持了一种动态治疗联盟理论,其特征是患者与治疗师之间持续进行协商。