Suppr超能文献

流产时患者避孕方法选择的生存分析 - 夏威夷火奴鲁鲁,2010 年 5 月至 2016 年 12 月。

Survival Analysis of Patient Contraceptive Choice Method at Time of Abortion - Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 2010-December 2016.

机构信息

Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV).

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI (KV, GM, SR, RS, BK, MT).

出版信息

Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Sep 1;79(9):272-278.

Abstract

The relationship between contraceptive method choice at the time of abortion and risk for subsequent abortions is not well understood. This article uses an existing data set from the University of Hawai'i Women's Options Center between May 2010 and December 2016 to examine if such a relationship exists. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis was used to evaluate contraceptive method prescribed or provided at index abortion encounters and likelihood of additional abortions. Patients who received a prescription of oral contraceptive pills, patches or rings at their index abortion were 61% more likely to have an additional abortion than those who had no contraceptive method recorded (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.28). Patients who received a long-acting reversible contraceptive method at their index abortion were 59% less likely to have an additional abortion when compared with a patient receiving no method (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). The findings show that patients who were prescribed oral contraceptives pills, patches, or rings were more likely than patients who had no contraceptive method prescribed or provided to have more than one abortion during the data collection period. Contraceptive method choice at time of abortion is complex and providers should be thorough in their counseling about failure rates, while also remaining vigilant in supporting patient autonomy and avoiding coercive or stigmatizing language.

摘要

人工流产时避孕方法的选择与随后流产风险之间的关系尚未得到很好的理解。本文利用 2010 年 5 月至 2016 年 12 月期间夏威夷大学妇女选择中心的现有数据集,研究是否存在这种关系。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归生存分析评估人工流产时规定或提供的避孕方法与额外流产的可能性之间的关系。与未记录避孕方法的患者相比,在人工流产时接受口服避孕药、贴片或环处方的患者再次发生流产的可能性增加 61%(危险比[HR],1.61;95%置信区间[CI],1.14-2.28)。与未接受任何方法的患者相比,在人工流产时接受长效可逆避孕方法的患者再次发生流产的可能性降低 59%(HR,0.41;95%CI,0.20-0.86)。研究结果表明,与未接受任何避孕方法处方或提供的患者相比,在人工流产时接受口服避孕药、贴片或环的患者在数据收集期间更有可能发生多次流产。人工流产时的避孕方法选择较为复杂,医生应在咨询时详细说明失败率,同时保持对患者自主权的支持,避免使用强制性或污名化的语言。

相似文献

2
Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.
Br J Fam Plann. 1998 Apr;24(1):18-20.
4
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 2 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Nov;37(11):1033-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8.
5
Contraception after medication abortion in the United States: results from a cluster randomized trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):107.e1-107.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Association between contraceptive method chosen after induced abortion and incidence of repeat abortion in Northern Portugal.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020 Aug;25(4):259-263. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1764527. Epub 2020 May 28.
7
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0.
8
Funding policies and postabortion long-acting reversible contraception: results from a cluster randomized trial.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;214(6):716.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
10
An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion.
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion.
Contraception. 2018 Apr;97(4):329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
2
Which Abortion Patients Have Had a Prior Abortion? Findings from the 2014 U.S. Abortion Patient Survey.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;27(1):58-63. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6410. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
What is survival analysis, and when should I use it?
J Bras Pneumol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):77. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000013.
5
Effectiveness of peri-abortion counselling in preventing subsequent unplanned pregnancy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2016 Jan;42(1):59-67. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101096. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
6
Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):171-5. doi: 10.1363/46e1614. Epub 2014 May 23.
7
Out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage for abortion in the United States.
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):e211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.01.003.
8
Immediate postabortion access to IUDs, implants and DMPA reduces repeat pregnancy within 1 year in a New York City practice.
Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
9
Understanding women's desires for contraceptive counseling at the time of first-trimester surgical abortion.
Contraception. 2014 Jan;89(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
10
Comparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.
Contraception. 2011 Dec;84(6):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.018. Epub 2011 May 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验