The Labatt Family Heart Center, Division of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2020 Dec;63(6):843-855. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2019-0317OC.
The potential benefit of heart rate reduction (HRR), independent of β-blockade, on right ventricular (RV) function in pulmonary hypertension (PH) remains undecided. We studied HRR effects on RV fibrosis and function in PH and RV pressure-loading models. Adult rats were randomized to ) sham controls, ) monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH, ) SU5416 + hypoxia (SUHX)-induced PH, or ) pulmonary artery banding (PAB). Ivabradine (IVA) (10 mg/kg/d) was administered from 2 weeks after PH induction or PAB. Exercise tolerance, echocardiography, and pressure-volume hemodynamics were obtained at a terminal experiment 3 weeks later. RV myocardial samples were analyzed for putative mechanisms of HRR effects through fibrosis, profibrotic molecular signaling, and Ca handling. The effects of IVA versus carvedilol on human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes beat rate and relaxation properties were evaluated . Despite unabated severely elevated RV systolic pressures, IVA improved RV systolic and diastolic function, profibrotic signaling, and RV fibrosis in PH/PAB rats. RV systolic-elastance (control, 121 ± 116; MCT, 49 ± 36 vs. MCT+IVA, 120 ± 54; PAB, 70 ± 20 vs. PAB+IVA, 168 ± 76; SUHX, 86 ± 56 vs. SUHX +IVA, 218 ± 111; all < 0.05), the time constant of RV relaxation, echo indices of RV function, and fibrosis (fibrosis: control, 4.6 ± 1%; MCT, 13.4 ± 6.5 vs. MCT+IVA, 6.7 ± 2.6%; PAB, 11.4 ± 4.5 vs. PAB+IVA, 6.4 ± 5.1%; SUHX, 10 ± 4.6 vs. SUHX+IVA, 3.9 ± 2.2%; all < 0.001) were improved by IVA versus controls. IVA had a dose-response effect on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes beat rate by delaying Ca loss from the cytoplasm. In experimental PH or RV pressure loading, HRR improves RV fibrosis, function, and exercise endurance independent of β-blockade. The balance between adverse tachycardia and bradycardia requires further study, but judicious HRR may provide a promising strategy to improve RV function in clinical PH.
心率降低(HRR)对肺动脉高压(PH)右心室(RV)功能的潜在益处,独立于β受体阻滞剂,仍未确定。我们研究了 HRR 对 PH 和 RV 压力负荷模型中 RV 纤维化和功能的影响。成年大鼠随机分为)假对照,)野百合碱(MCT)诱导的 PH,)SU5416+低氧(SUHX)诱导的 PH,或)肺动脉结扎(PAB)。在 PH 诱导后 2 周或 PAB 后给予依伐布雷定(IVA)(10mg/kg/d)。3 周后的终末实验中获得运动耐量、超声心动图和压力-容积血液动力学。通过纤维化、促纤维化分子信号和 Ca 处理分析 RV 心肌样本,以研究 HRR 作用的潜在机制。评估 IVA 与卡维地洛对人诱导多能干细胞衍生的心肌细胞搏动率和舒张特性的影响。尽管 RV 收缩压严重升高,但 IVA 仍改善 PH/PAB 大鼠的 RV 收缩和舒张功能、促纤维化信号和 RV 纤维化。RV 收缩弹性(对照组,121±116;MCT 组,49±36 与 MCT+IVA 组,120±54;PAB 组,70±20 与 PAB+IVA 组,168±76;SUHX 组,86±56 与 SUHX+IVA 组,218±111;均 < 0.05)、RV 舒张的时间常数、RV 功能和纤维化的超声指数(纤维化:对照组,4.6±1%;MCT 组,13.4±6.5 与 MCT+IVA 组,6.7±2.6%;PAB 组,11.4±4.5 与 PAB+IVA 组,6.4±5.1%;SUHX 组,10±4.6 与 SUHX+IVA 组,3.9±2.2%;均 < 0.001),与对照组相比,IVA 均有所改善。IVA 对诱导多能干细胞衍生的心肌细胞搏动率具有剂量反应作用,通过延迟细胞质中 Ca 的丢失。在实验性 PH 或 RV 压力负荷中,HRR 可改善 RV 纤维化、功能和运动耐力,独立于β受体阻滞剂。不良心动过速和心动过缓之间的平衡需要进一步研究,但明智的 HRR 可能为改善临床 PH 中的 RV 功能提供有希望的策略。