Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, No. 38 Dengzhou Road, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Department of orthodontics, The affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, School of Stomatology, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266021, China.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Sep 11;20(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01116-6.
Master of public health (MPH) plays an important role in Chinese medical education, and the dissertations is an important part of MPH education. In MPH dissertations, most are observational studies. Compared with randomized controlled trial (RCT), observational studies are more prone to information bias. So, the reporting of the observational studies should be transparent and standard. But, no research on evaluating the reporting quality of the MPH dissertation has been found.
A systematic literature search was performed in the Wanfang database from January 1, 2014 to May 31, 2019. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observation Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement was adopted to evaluate the reporting quality of the selected studies. Articles that met the following criteria were selected: (1) observational studies, including cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies; (2) original articles; (3) studies on humans, including both adults and children.
The Median of compliance to individual STROBE items was 74.79%. The mean (standard deviation) of STROBE score was 14.29 (1.84). Five items/sub-items were 100% reported ("reported" and "partly reported" were combined): background, objectives, study design, report numbers of individuals at each stage, and key result. Fifteen items/sub-items were reported by 75% or more. Reporting of methods and results was often omitted: missing data (6.67%), sensitivity analyses (3.63%), flow diagram (15.15%), and absolute risk (0%). Logistic regression analysis indicated that cohort studies (OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.27-9.16), funding support (OR = 4.37, 95% CI = 1.27-9.16) and more published papers during postgraduate period (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.40-8.60) were related to high reporting quality.
In short, the reporting quality of observational studies in MPH's dissertations in China is suboptimal. However, it's necessary to improve the reporting of method and results sections. We recommend that authors should be stricter to adhere STROBE statement when conducting observational studies.
公共卫生硕士(MPH)在中国医学教育中发挥着重要作用,学位论文是 MPH 教育的重要组成部分。在 MPH 论文中,大多数为观察性研究。与随机对照试验(RCT)相比,观察性研究更容易出现信息偏倚。因此,观察性研究的报告应该透明且规范。但是,目前尚未发现评估 MPH 论文报告质量的研究。
系统检索 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 5 月 31 日在中国万方数据库发表的文献。采用观察性研究的报告质量评价工具(Strengthening the Reporting of Observation Studies in Epidemiology,STROBE)评估纳入研究的报告质量。纳入标准为:(1)观察性研究,包括横断面研究、病例对照研究和队列研究;(2)原始研究;(3)以人为研究对象,包括成人和儿童。
纳入研究的 STROBE 条目平均符合率为 74.79%,STROBE 量表平均得分为 14.29 分(1.84 分)。有 5 个条目/亚条目(“报道”和“部分报道”合并)的报告率为 100%:背景、目的、研究设计、各阶段个体数量报告、主要结果。15 个条目/亚条目报告率≥75%。方法和结果部分的报告常被遗漏:缺失数据(6.67%)、敏感性分析(3.63%)、流程图(15.15%)和绝对风险(0%)。Logistic 回归分析显示,队列研究(OR=3.41,95%CI=1.27-9.16)、有基金支持(OR=4.37,95%CI=1.27-9.16)和研究生期间发表论文较多(OR=3.46,95%CI=1.40-8.60)与高报告质量有关。
中国 MPH 论文中观察性研究的报告质量较差,方法和结果部分的报告有待提高。建议作者在进行观察性研究时应更加严格地遵循 STROBE 声明。