Suppr超能文献

从旧石器时代模型和进化角度看人类健康:关于太阳辐射有益影响和风险的快照。

Lessons Learned from Paleolithic Models and Evolution for Human Health: A Snap Shot on Beneficial Effects and Risks of Solar Radiation.

机构信息

Center for Clinical and Experimental Photodermatology and Department of Dermatology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1268:3-15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46227-7_1.

Abstract

How to deal with the powerful rays of the sun represents a fundamental question of environmental medicine, affecting skin cancer prevention campaigns and many other aspects of public health. However, when preparing recommendations for sunlight exposure, physicians, scientists, and other health authorities are in a dilemma, because solar radiation exerts both positive and negative effects on human health. While positive effects are at least in part mediated via the UV(Ultraviolet)-B-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D, negative effects include the UV-mediated photocarcinogenesis of skin cancer. During the last century, interest in the positive effects of the sun on our health increased dramatically after the introduction of the so-called vitamin D/cancer hypothesis. In the late 1930s, Peller and Stephenson reported higher rates of skin cancer but lower rates of other cancers among the US Navy personnel. Several years later, Apperly reported an association between latitude and cancer mortality rate in North America. He argued that the "relative immunity to cancer is a direct effect of sunlight". Although the hypothesis that sun exposure may be beneficial against cancer had been proposed early, these observations supporting the hypothesis were ignored for nearly 40 years, until a clear mechanism was proposed. In the 1980s, Garland and Garland published a pilot study focusing on colon cancer and suggested that the possible benefits of sun exposure could be attributed to vitamin D. Later, the proposed protective role of vitamin D was extended to many other types of cancer. Subsequent laboratory investigations supported potential anti-carcinogenic effects of vitamin D compounds. We know today that many, but not all, of the positive effects of the sun on human health are mediated by the UV-induced cutaneous synthesis of vitamin D and other photoproducts. However, because of the abovementioned dilemma, there is an ongoing controversial discussion in scientific communities and in the general population that how much sunlight is optimal for human health. This chapter summarizes the content of the third edition of "Sunlight, Vitamin D and Skin Cancer," a book specifically designed and organized to be an up-to-date review covering the most important aspects of the ongoing debate on how much sun is good for human health and how to balance between the positive and negative effects of solar and artificial UV-radiation, including lessons learned from Paleolithic models and evolution .

摘要

如何应对太阳的强烈射线是环境医学的一个基本问题,它影响着皮肤癌预防运动和许多其他公共卫生方面。然而,当为阳光暴露制定建议时,医生、科学家和其他卫生当局陷入了困境,因为太阳辐射对人类健康既有积极影响,也有消极影响。虽然积极影响至少部分是通过 UV(紫外线)-B 诱导的皮肤维生素 D 合成介导的,但负面影响包括紫外线介导的皮肤癌光致癌作用。在上个世纪,随着所谓的维生素 D/癌症假说的提出,人们对太阳对我们健康的积极影响的兴趣急剧增加。在 20 世纪 30 年代后期,Peller 和 Stephenson 报告称,美国海军人员的皮肤癌发病率较高,但其他癌症发病率较低。几年后,Apperly 报告了北美的纬度与癌症死亡率之间的关联。他认为,“对癌症的相对免疫力是阳光的直接作用”。尽管早期就提出了阳光照射可能有益于预防癌症的假说,但这些支持假说的观察结果被忽视了近 40 年,直到提出了明确的机制。20 世纪 80 年代,Garland 和 Garland 发表了一项关于结肠癌的试点研究,该研究表明,阳光照射的可能益处可以归因于维生素 D。后来,维生素 D 的保护作用被扩展到许多其他类型的癌症。随后的实验室研究支持维生素 D 化合物的潜在抗癌作用。今天我们知道,太阳对人类健康的许多(但不是全部)积极影响都是通过 UV 诱导的皮肤维生素 D 和其他光产物的合成介导的。然而,由于上述困境,科学界和普通大众一直在就人类健康最佳阳光量进行持续的争议性讨论。本章总结了第三版《阳光、维生素 D 和皮肤癌》一书的内容,该书专门设计和组织,是对当前关于多少阳光对人类健康有益以及如何平衡太阳和人工 UV 辐射的积极和消极影响的持续争论的最新综述,包括从旧石器时代模型和进化中吸取的教训。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验