• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年会阴是更安全的会阴吗?产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。

Is the older perineum a safer perineum? Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):693-699. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02358-5. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-020-02358-5
PMID:32918679
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is the most common cause of anal incontinence. Identifying risk factors may facilitate change in labour and delivery practice, potentially reducing the risk. The objective of this study is to identify maternal, foetal and intrapartum risk factors for OASI in a regional hospital.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective analysis of vaginal deliveries over a 10-year period (2008-2017). Anal sphincter injury was diagnosed by an experienced clinician and classified according to RCOG recommendations. A multiple logistic regression model was created using the presence of OASI as the dependent variable. Coefficients were adjusted for relevant maternal, foetal and intrapartum risk factors.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 23,887 vaginal deliveries. Of these births, 18,550 were spontaneous (77.66%), 3746 vacuum-assisted (15.68%), 1196 forceps (5.01%) and 395 sequential instrumental deliveries (1.65%). The overall rate of OASI was 1.76%, with an upward trend seen in nulliparous mothers. Significant factors that increased the risk of OASI were nulliparity, Asian ethnicity, delivery by forceps or sequential instruments, and shoulder dystocia. Vacuum delivery did not significantly increase risk.

CONCLUSION

Maternal age ≥ 35 years confers a protective effect after adjusting for parity, birth weight and mode of delivery. Given the context of an ageing reproductive population, additional research is required to investigate the impact of maternal age on anal sphincter injury.

摘要

介绍

产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)是肛门失禁最常见的原因。确定危险因素可能有助于改变分娩和分娩实践,从而降低风险。本研究的目的是在一家地区医院确定产科肛门括约肌损伤的产妇、胎儿和分娩期危险因素。

方法

我们对 10 年期间(2008-2017 年)的阴道分娩进行了回顾性分析。肛门括约肌损伤由经验丰富的临床医生诊断,并根据 RCOG 建议进行分类。使用 OASI 的存在作为因变量创建了多变量逻辑回归模型。使用相关的产妇、胎儿和分娩期危险因素对系数进行调整。

结果

在研究期间,有 23887 例阴道分娩。在这些分娩中,18550 例为自发性(77.66%),3746 例为真空辅助(15.68%),1196 例为产钳(5.01%),395 例为连续器械分娩(1.65%)。OASI 的总体发生率为 1.76%,初产妇的发生率呈上升趋势。增加 OASI 风险的显著因素是初产妇、亚洲人种、产钳或连续器械分娩以及肩难产。真空分娩并未显著增加风险。

结论

调整产次、出生体重和分娩方式后,年龄≥35 岁的产妇具有保护作用。鉴于生殖人口老龄化的背景,需要进一步研究年龄对肛门括约肌损伤的影响。

相似文献

1
Is the older perineum a safer perineum? Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury.老年会阴是更安全的会阴吗?产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。
Ir J Med Sci. 2021 May;190(2):693-699. doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02358-5. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
2
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.印度南部一家三级医疗中心产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)的危险因素。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3398-0. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
3
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.预测现代产科人群中的产科肛门括约肌损伤
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
4
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women.经产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Mar;303(3):709-714. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05806-w. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
5
Does the implementation of a restrictive episiotomy policy for operative deliveries increase the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury?实行限制会阴切开术的分娩政策是否会增加产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):87-94. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05174-0. Epub 2019 May 5.
6
Predictive factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: systematic review and meta-analysis.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Oct;62(4):486-496. doi: 10.1002/uog.26292.
7
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries - review of our date between 2015-2017.产科肛门括约肌损伤——我们2015年至2017年数据的回顾。
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(1):18-22.
8
Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.分娩时会阴损伤的危险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):255-60. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.547.
9
Factors associated with obstetric anal sphincter injuries in midwife-led birth: A cross sectional study.助产士主导分娩中与产科肛门括约肌损伤相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Jul;62:264-272. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
10
Obstetric anal sphincter injury risk reduction: a retrospective observational analysis.降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险:一项回顾性观察分析。
J Perinat Med. 2014 Nov;42(6):761-7. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0269.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspective on Perinatal Birth Canal Injuries: An Analysis of Risk Factors, Injury Mechanisms, Treatment Methods, and Patients' Quality of Life: A Literature Review.围产期产道损伤的研究视角:危险因素、损伤机制、治疗方法及患者生活质量分析:文献综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 20;14(10):3583. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103583.
2
Beyond the numbers: Impact of obesity on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) outcomes in women.数字之外:肥胖对女性产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)结局的影响
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;168(3):1171-1177. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15981. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Spontaneous Perineal Trauma during Non-Operative Childbirth-Retrospective Analysis of Perineal Laceration Risk Factors.
非手术分娩时的自发性会阴创伤-会阴裂伤危险因素的回顾性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137653.