Suppr超能文献

光生物调节疗法治疗牙槽骨炎(干槽症)的效果:系统评价与荟萃分析

The effects of photobiomodulation therapy for treatment of alveolar osteitis (Dry Socket): Systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shafaee Hooman, Bardideh Erfan, Nazari Mohammad Sadegh, Asadi Reza, Shahidi Bahareh, Rangrazi Abdolrasoul

机构信息

Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Dec;32:102000. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.102000. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dry socket (alveolar osteitis) is one of the most common complications that occur after the extraction of permanent teeth. The aim of this review was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBT) with other treatment methods on alveolar osteitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane's CENTRAL online databases were searched based on the search strategy. Also, the prominent laser journals and the references of relevant studies were hand searched for eligible studies and then the data were extracted from the retrieved studies were extracted using piloted custom forms. The data were combined and analyzed using inverse-variance random-effect meta-analysis.

RESULTS

For the treatment of dry socket, pain perception based on the VAS score, PBT on average has a 3.41 higher pain level reduction compared to alveogyl which seems to be both statistically and clinically significant. In addition, based on the GRADE score, the evidence seems to be of moderate quality. Also, in the individual studies which were included in this systematic review, PBT seems to be more effective than other methods (Salicept, zinc-oxide eugenol, ozone, and photodynamic therapy) in pain reduction of patients with alveolar osteitis.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT, in general, has a higher ability in decreasing pain levels for patients with alveolar osteitis (dry socket) compared to alveogyl. Therefore, PBT could be used as an appropriate method for treatment and controlling the signs of dry socket.

摘要

引言

干槽症(牙槽骨炎)是恒牙拔除后最常见的并发症之一。本综述的目的是评估和比较光生物调节疗法(PBT)与其他治疗方法对牙槽骨炎的疗效。

方法和材料

根据检索策略对MEDLINE、科学网、EMBASE、Scopus和Cochrane中心在线数据库进行检索。此外,还手动检索了著名的激光期刊和相关研究的参考文献以查找符合条件的研究,然后使用预先设计的自定义表格从检索到的研究中提取数据。采用逆方差随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行合并和分析。

结果

对于干槽症的治疗,基于视觉模拟评分法(VAS)的疼痛感知,与牙槽糊剂相比,PBT平均疼痛水平降低幅度高3.41,这在统计学和临床上似乎都具有显著意义。此外,根据GRADE评分,证据质量似乎为中等。而且,在纳入本系统评价的个体研究中,PBT在减轻牙槽骨炎患者疼痛方面似乎比其他方法(Salicept、氧化锌丁香酚、臭氧和光动力疗法)更有效。

结论

总体而言,与牙槽糊剂相比,PBT在降低牙槽骨炎(干槽症)患者疼痛水平方面具有更高的能力。因此,PBT可作为治疗和控制干槽症症状的一种合适方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验