Suppr超能文献

临床共识与反复昏迷恢复量表修订评估相比,对迁延性意识障碍的误诊。

The misdiagnosis of prolonged disorders of consciousness by a clinical consensus compared with repeated coma-recovery scale-revised assessment.

机构信息

International Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome and Consciousness Science Institute, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310036, China.

Rehabilitation Center for Brain Damage, Wujing Hospital of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2020 Sep 12;20(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01924-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that a single Coma-Recovery Scale-Revision (CRS-R) assessment can identify high rates of misdiagnosis by clinical consensus. The aim of this study was to investigate the proportion of misdiagnosis by clinical consensus compared to repeated behavior-scale assessments in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC).

METHODS

Patients with prolonged DOC during hospitalization were screened by clinicians, and the clinicians formed a clinical-consensus diagnosis. Trained professionals used the CRS-R to evaluate the consciousness levels of the enrolled patients repeatedly (≥5 times) within a week. Based on the repeated evaluation results, the enrolled patients with prolonged DOC were divided into unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), and emergence from MCS (EMCS). Finally, the relationship between the results of the CRS-R and the clinical consensus were analyzed.

RESULTS

In this study, 137 patients with a clinical-consensus diagnosis of prolonged DOC were enrolled. It was found that 24.7% of patients with clinical UWS were actually in MCS after a single CRS-R behavior evaluation, while the repeated CRS-R evaluation results showed that the proportion of misdiagnosis of MCS was 38.2%. A total of 16.7% of EMCS patients were misdiagnosed with clinical MCS, and 1.1% of EMCS patients were misdiagnosed with clinical UWS.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of the misdiagnosis by clinical consensus is still relatively high. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the importance of the bedside CRS-R behavior assessment and should apply the CRS-R tool in daily procedures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04139239 ; Registered 24 October 2019 - Retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,单次昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)评估可以通过临床共识识别出高误诊率。本研究旨在调查与重复行为量表评估相比,在持续性意识障碍(DOC)患者中,临床共识诊断的误诊率比例。

方法

临床医生对住院期间持续性 DOC 患者进行筛查,并由临床医生形成临床共识诊断。经过培训的专业人员在一周内对入组患者进行多次(≥5 次)CRS-R 评估。根据重复评估结果,将入组的持续性 DOC 患者分为无反应觉醒综合征(UWS)、最小意识状态(MCS)和从 MCS 中苏醒(EMCS)。最后,分析 CRS-R 结果与临床共识的关系。

结果

本研究纳入了 137 例临床共识诊断为持续性 DOC 的患者。结果发现,在单次 CRS-R 行为评估后,24.7%的临床 UWS 患者实际上处于 MCS 状态,而重复 CRS-R 评估结果显示,MCS 的误诊率为 38.2%。共有 16.7%的 EMCS 患者被误诊为临床 MCS,1.1%的 EMCS 患者被误诊为临床 UWS。

结论

临床共识的误诊率仍然相对较高。因此,临床医生应意识到床边 CRS-R 行为评估的重要性,并在日常操作中应用 CRS-R 工具。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT04139239;注册日期:2019 年 10 月 24 日;回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2f4/7488705/7446168685f0/12883_2020_1924_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验