Suppr超能文献

沙库巴曲缬沙坦与心脏性猝死的关系:根据植入式心脏复律除颤器的使用和心力衰竭病因的分析:PARADIGM-HF 研究

Sacubitril/Valsartan and Sudden Cardiac Death According to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use and Heart Failure Cause: A PARADIGM-HF Analysis.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre and Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Medical School, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;8(10):844-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan therapy on sudden cardiac death (SCD) according to the use of and eligibility for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), stratified by heart failure cause.

BACKGROUND

SCD still accounts for a significant proportion of overall mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial (n = 8,399) were evaluated to assess patterns of ICD implantation and eligibility according to clinical guidelines. The impact of ICD (adjusted for propensity of ICD implantation) and sacubitril/valsartan therapy on SCD was evaluated by using cause-specific Cox models and competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

At baseline, of the 7,145 patients (85%) eligible for ICD implantation, only 1,243 (15%) had an ICD. Use of ICD varied by region with the highest rates in North America (56%) and lowest in Asia-Pacific (1.7%). In a propensity score-adjusted analysis, use of an ICD was associated with a 56% lower risk of SCD in ICD-eligible patients, in both patients with ischemic (p < 0.001) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.02). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SCD risk in patients with an ICD (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 to 0.99) and in those who were eligible for but did not receive an ICD (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.67 to 0.98). This effect was particularly evident in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p < 0.05), although interaction with the cause of HF was not significant (p = 0.11 in subjects using an ICD and p = 0.25 in eligible nonusers).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of an ICD was associated with lower rates of SCD, regardless of HF cause but was underused in most regions of the world in the PARADIGM-HF study. Sacubitril/valsartan reduced SCD risk regardless of use of an ICD or eligibility, particularly in ICD users and nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗对心脏衰竭射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者心源性猝死(SCD)的影响,并根据植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)的使用情况和适用情况,按心力衰竭的病因进行分层。

背景

SCD 仍然是 HFrEF 患者总体死亡率的重要组成部分。

方法

对 PARADIGM-HF(ARNI 与 ACEI 前瞻性比较以确定对心力衰竭患者全球死亡率和发病率的影响)试验(n=8399)中的患者进行评估,以根据临床指南评估 ICD 植入和适用情况。使用特定于病因的 Cox 模型和竞争风险分析评估 ICD(根据 ICD 植入的倾向进行调整)和沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗对 SCD 的影响。

结果

在基线时,7145 名符合 ICD 植入标准的患者(85%)中,只有 1243 名(15%)植入了 ICD。ICD 的使用因地区而异,北美地区的使用率最高(56%),亚太地区最低(1.7%)。在倾向评分调整分析中,在符合 ICD 植入标准的患者中,ICD 的使用使 SCD 风险降低了 56%,在缺血性(p<0.001)和非缺血性心肌病患者中均如此(p=0.02)。沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了 ICD 患者(风险比 [HR]:0.49;95%置信区间 [CI]:0.25 至 0.99)和符合 ICD 但未接受 ICD 患者(HR:0.81;95%CI:0.67 至 0.98)的 SCD 风险。这一效果在非缺血性心肌病患者中尤为明显(p<0.05),尽管心力衰竭病因与这一效果之间没有显著的交互作用(在使用 ICD 的患者中 p=0.11,在符合 ICD 但未使用的患者中 p=0.25)。

结论

无论心力衰竭病因如何,ICD 的使用均与较低的 SCD 发生率相关,但在 PARADIGM-HF 研究中,世界上大多数地区的 ICD 使用率都较低。沙库巴曲缬沙坦降低了 SCD 风险,无论是否使用 ICD 或是否符合条件,尤其是在 ICD 使用者和非缺血性心肌病患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验