Shchendrygina Anastasia, Yehya Amin, Skouri Hadi
Department of Hospital Therapy No. 2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) Moscow, Russia.
Advanced Heart Failure Center, Sentara Heart Hospital Norfolk, VA, US.
Card Fail Rev. 2025 Jun 25;11:e14. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2025.05. eCollection 2025.
Recent advances in the pharmacological therapy of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have significantly impacted the overall survival, heart failure hospitalisations and rates of sudden cardiac death (SCD). In this context, the relevant timing of placing ICDs as primary prevention is a matter of on-going debate. This manuscript provides evidence for an updated view regarding the timing of implanting ICD in eligible patients with HFrEF receiving optimal guideline-directed medical therapy, accounting for the timing to reverse cardiac remodelling (RCR) occurrence and residual SCD risks over time. Clinically significant RCR occurs beyond 3 months of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy, while the residual risks of SCDs remain low for certain HFrEF populations. However, when deciding on ICD implantation, one should always consider individual modulators of RCR and SCD risks, as well as the non-competing risks of death that can affect patients' overall outcomes. Risk stratification algorithms need to be developed and validated in future pragmatic clinical trials to further define better timing for the use of ICDs in primary prevention.
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)药物治疗的最新进展对总体生存率、心力衰竭住院率和心源性猝死(SCD)发生率产生了重大影响。在此背景下,将植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)作为一级预防的相关时机是一个持续争论的问题。本手稿为植入ICD的时机提供了最新观点的证据,该观点适用于接受最佳指南指导药物治疗的符合条件的HFrEF患者,同时考虑到心脏重塑逆转(RCR)发生的时间以及随时间推移残留的SCD风险。具有临床意义的RCR在最佳指南指导药物治疗3个月后出现,而某些HFrEF人群的SCD残留风险仍然较低。然而,在决定是否植入ICD时,应始终考虑RCR和SCD风险的个体调节因素,以及可能影响患者总体结局的非竞争性死亡风险。未来需要在务实的临床试验中开发和验证风险分层算法,以进一步确定在一级预防中使用ICD的更佳时机。