• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本肺动脉高压患者中 2015 ESC/ERS 指南风险评估的单中心预后验证。

Single-center prognostic validation of the risk assessment of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in Japan.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;98(9):653-658. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0640. Epub 2020 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1139/cjpp-2019-0640
PMID:32924564
Abstract

The 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension include a multidimensional risk assessment for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, prognostic validations of this risk assessment are limited, especially outside Europe. Here, we validated the risk assessment strategy in PAH patients in our institution in Japan. Eighty consecutive PAH patients who underwent right heart catheterization between November 2006 and December 2018 were analyzed. Patients were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk by using a simplified version of the risk assessment that included seven variables: World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walking distance, peak oxygen consumption, brain natriuretic peptide, right atrial pressure, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and cardiac index. The high-risk group showed significantly higher mortality than the low- or intermediate-risk group at baseline ( < 0.001 for both comparisons), and the mortalities in the intermediate- and low-risk groups were both low ( = 0.989). At follow-up, patients who improved to or maintained a low-risk status showed better survival than those who did not ( = 0.041). Our data suggest that this risk assessment can predict higher mortality risk and long-term survival in PAH patients in Japan.

摘要

2015 年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会肺动脉高压诊断和治疗指南包括对肺动脉高压(PAH)患者进行多维风险评估。然而,这种风险评估的预后验证有限,尤其是在欧洲以外地区。在这里,我们验证了日本机构中 PAH 患者的风险评估策略。分析了 2006 年 11 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受右心导管检查的 80 例连续 PAH 患者。使用简化的风险评估版本,包括七个变量(世界卫生组织功能分类、6 分钟步行距离、峰值氧耗量、脑钠肽、右心房压、混合静脉血氧饱和度和心指数)将患者分为低危、中危或高危。高危组在基线时的死亡率明显高于低危或中危组(两者比较均 < 0.001),中危组和低危组的死亡率均较低(=0.989)。随访时,风险状况改善或维持为低危的患者的生存率优于未改善的患者(=0.041)。我们的数据表明,这种风险评估可以预测日本 PAH 患者的更高死亡率风险和长期生存率。

相似文献

1
Single-center prognostic validation of the risk assessment of the 2015 ESC/ERS guidelines in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension in Japan.日本肺动脉高压患者中 2015 ESC/ERS 指南风险评估的单中心预后验证。
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;98(9):653-658. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0640. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
2
Simplified risk stratification for pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease.结缔组织病相关肺动脉高压的简化风险分层。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;38(12):3619-3626. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04690-3. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
3
A pragmatic approach to risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension using the 2015 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines.采用 2015 年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲呼吸学会指南对肺动脉高压进行风险评估的实用方法。
Open Heart. 2021 Oct;8(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001725.
4
Evaluation of the European Society of Cardiology Risk Assessment Score in Incident Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.评估欧洲心脏病学会风险评估评分在系统性硬化症相关肺动脉高压中的作用。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024 Jul;76(7):973-983. doi: 10.1002/acr.25328. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
5
Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation Is a Better Prognosticator Than Cardiac Index in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.混合静脉血氧饱和度比心指数更能预测肺动脉高压的预后。
Chest. 2020 Dec;158(6):2546-2555. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.053. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Performance of DETECT Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Algorithm According to the Hemodynamic Definition of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the 2022 European Society of Cardiology and the European Respiratory Society Guidelines.根据 2022 年欧洲心脏病学会和欧洲呼吸学会指南中肺动脉高压的血流动力学定义,评估 DETECT 肺动脉高压算法的性能。
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024 May;76(5):777-782. doi: 10.1002/art.42791. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
7
Association of N-Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.脑钠肽前体 N 端与肺动脉高压患者长期预后的相关性。
Circulation. 2019 May 21;139(21):2440-2450. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039360.
8
Guideline implementation and early risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease: A retrospective cohort study.先天性心脏病相关肺动脉高压的指南实施与早期风险评估:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Respir J. 2019 Nov;13(11):693-699. doi: 10.1111/crj.13076. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
9
Mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension: prediction by the 2015 European pulmonary hypertension guidelines risk stratification model.肺动脉高压死亡率:2015 年欧洲肺动脉高压指南风险分层模型预测。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Aug 3;50(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00740-2017. Print 2017 Aug.
10
Risk assessment in medically treated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension patients.医学治疗的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压患者的风险评估。
Eur Respir J. 2018 Nov 8;52(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00248-2018. Print 2018 Nov.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Value of Serial Risk Stratification in Adult and Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review.连续风险分层对成人和儿科肺动脉高压的预后价值:系统评价。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 2;13(13):e034151. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.034151. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
2
Risk stratification in adult and pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension: A systematic review.成人及儿童肺动脉高压的风险分层:一项系统综述。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 10;9:1035453. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1035453. eCollection 2022.