Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 14;15(9):e0238920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238920. eCollection 2020.
Ruminative thought is a style of thinking which involves repetitively focusing upon one's own negative mood, its causes and its consequences. The negative effects of rumination are well-documented, but comparatively little is known about how rumination is experienced. The evaluative nature of rumination suggests that it could involve more inner speech than non-ruminative states. The present study (N = 31) combined facial electromyography and self-report questionnaires to determine the type of inner experience that occurs in rumination. The results showed that induced rumination involved similar levels of muscle activity related to inner speech as periods of induced distraction. However, experience sampling and questionnaire responses showed that rumination involved more verbal thought, and also involved more evaluative and dialogic inner speech than distraction. These findings contribute to the understanding of inner speech as a flexible phenomenon and confirms the importance of employing multiple methods to investigate inner speech. Future research should clarify the link between inner speech in rumination and its negative effects on wellbeing.
反思性思维是一种思维方式,涉及反复关注自己的负面情绪、其原因和后果。反思的负面影响已有充分的记录,但对于反思是如何被体验的知之甚少。反思的评价性质表明,它可能比非反思状态涉及更多的内部言语。本研究(N=31)结合了面部肌电图和自我报告问卷,以确定在反思中发生的内部体验的类型。结果表明,诱发的反思涉及与内部言语相关的肌肉活动水平与诱导分心相似。然而,体验抽样和问卷反应表明,反思比分心涉及更多的言语思维,也涉及更多的评价性和对话性内部言语。这些发现有助于理解内部言语作为一种灵活的现象,并证实了采用多种方法来研究内部言语的重要性。未来的研究应该阐明反思中的内部言语与其对幸福感的负面影响之间的联系。