Nalborczyk Ladislas, Banjac Sonja, Baeyens Céline, Grandchamp Romain, Koster Ernst H W, Perrone-Bertolotti Marcela, Lœvenbruck Hélène
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000 Grenoble, France; Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium; GIPSA-lab, CNRS, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LPNC, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Jan;159:23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Previous research showed that mental rumination, considered as a form of repetitive and negative inner speech, is associated with increased facial muscular activity. However, the relation between these muscular activations and the underlying mental processes is still unclear. In this study, we tried to separate the facial electromyographic correlates of induced rumination related to either i) mechanisms of (inner) speech production or ii) rumination as a state of pondering on negative affects. To this end, we compared two groups of participants submitted to two types of rumination induction (for a total of 85 female undergraduate students without excessive depressive symptoms). The first type of induction was designed to specifically induce rumination in a verbal modality whereas the second one was designed to induce rumination in a visual modality. Following the motor simulation view of inner speech production, we hypothesised that the verbal rumination induction should result in a higher increase of activity in the speech-related muscles as compared to the non-verbal rumination induction. We also hypothesised that relaxation focused on the orofacial area should be more efficient in reducing rumination (when experienced in a verbal modality) than a relaxation focused on a non-orofacial area. Our results do not corroborate these hypotheses, as both rumination inductions resulted in a similar increase of peripheral muscular activity in comparison to baseline levels. Moreover, the two relaxation types were similarly efficient in reducing rumination, whatever the rumination induction. We discuss these results in relation to the inner speech literature and suggest that because rumination is a habitual and automatic form of emotion regulation, it might be a particularly (strongly) internalised and condensed form of inner speech. Pre-registered protocol, preprint, data, as well as reproducible code and figures are available at: https://osf.io/c9pag/.
先前的研究表明,被视为一种重复性消极内心言语形式的心理反刍与面部肌肉活动增加有关。然而,这些肌肉激活与潜在心理过程之间的关系仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们试图区分与以下两种情况相关的诱导反刍的面部肌电相关因素:i)(内心)言语产生机制,或ii)作为对消极情绪进行沉思状态的反刍。为此,我们比较了两组接受两种反刍诱导类型的参与者(总共85名无过度抑郁症状的本科女生)。第一种诱导类型旨在专门以言语方式诱导反刍,而第二种旨在以视觉方式诱导反刍。根据内心言语产生的运动模拟观点,我们假设与非言语反刍诱导相比,言语反刍诱导应导致与言语相关肌肉的活动有更高的增加。我们还假设,专注于口面部区域的放松在减少反刍(当以言语方式体验时)方面应比专注于非口面部区域的放松更有效。我们的结果并未证实这些假设,因为与基线水平相比,两种反刍诱导均导致外周肌肉活动有类似的增加。此外,无论反刍诱导类型如何,两种放松类型在减少反刍方面同样有效。我们结合内心言语文献讨论了这些结果,并提出由于反刍是一种习惯性且自动的情绪调节形式,它可能是一种特别(强烈)内化和浓缩的内心言语形式。预注册方案、预印本、数据以及可重现的代码和图表可在以下网址获取:https://osf.io/c9pag/ 。