• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ⅰ期临床试验中的正则化连续评估法。

Continual reassessment method with regularization in phase I clinical trials.

机构信息

Statistics and Decision Sciences, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Nov 1;30(6):964-978. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1818251. Epub 2020 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1080/10543406.2020.1818251
PMID:32926652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7954799/
Abstract

Many Phase I trial designs have been developed to improve upon the standard design. These designs can be classified as long-memory designs, for example, the continual reassessment method (CRM), and short-memory designs such as the modified toxicity probability interval (mTPI) design. Long-term memory designs use all data but their performance can be negatively affected by the model misspecification. Short-term memory designs only use data at the current dose and might lose efficiency as a result. To overcome these issues, we propose a regularized CRM (rCRM). The rCRM offers a trade-off between long-term memory and short-term memory methods. The rCRM gives more weight to data obtained at the doses with the estimated probability of toxicity closer to the target toxicity rate. The addition of a regularization term has an effect of shrinking the dimension of the model and leads to improved performance of the 2-parameter CRM. The rCRM is a good design choice to guide assignments in an expansion cohort phase of a dose-finding trial since dose assignments do not seem to change as often as in corresponding CRMs.

摘要

许多 I 期临床试验设计已经被开发出来以改进标准设计。这些设计可以分为长记忆设计,例如,连续再评估方法(CRM),和短记忆设计,如改良毒性概率区间(mTPI)设计。长记忆设计使用所有数据,但它们的性能可能会受到模型误设定的负面影响。短期记忆设计只使用当前剂量的数据,因此可能会失去效率。为了克服这些问题,我们提出了一种正则化 CRM(rCRM)。rCRM 在长期记忆和短期记忆方法之间提供了一种权衡。rCRM 更重视在毒性估计概率接近目标毒性率的剂量下获得的数据。添加正则化项的效果是缩小模型的维度,从而提高了 2 参数 CRM 的性能。rCRM 是指导剂量发现试验扩展队列阶段分配的一个不错的设计选择,因为剂量分配似乎不像相应的 CRM 那样经常改变。

相似文献

1
Continual reassessment method with regularization in phase I clinical trials.Ⅰ期临床试验中的正则化连续评估法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Nov 1;30(6):964-978. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1818251. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
2
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
3
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
The Randomized CRM: An Approach to Overcoming the Long-Memory Property of the CRM.随机CRM:一种克服CRM长记忆特性的方法。
J Biopharm Stat. 2017;27(6):1028-1042. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1293076. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
5
How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.如何使用连续评估法设计剂量探索研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0638-z.
6
Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.滚动连续评估法加过量控制:一种高效安全的剂量递增设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Aug;107:106436. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106436. Epub 2021 May 14.
7
Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.两阶段连续重新评估方法相对于最佳基准的性能。
Clin Trials. 2013;10(6):862-75. doi: 10.1177/1740774513503521. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
8
Evaluation of irrational dose assignment definitions using the continual reassessment method.使用连续重新评估法评估不合理剂量分配定义
Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;16(6):665-672. doi: 10.1177/1740774519873316. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
9
Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.序贯毒性分级剂量发现临床试验设计:连续评估法的扩展。
Clin Trials. 2012 Jun;9(3):303-13. doi: 10.1177/1740774512443593. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
10
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.剂量探索研究的连续重新评估方法:教程
Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision Medicine Proof-of-Concept Study of a TNF Inhibitor in FSGS and Treatment-Resistant Minimal Change Disease.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗局灶节段性肾小球硬化症和难治性微小病变肾病的精准医学概念验证研究
Kidney360. 2025 Feb 1;6(2):284-295. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000635. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficient ℓ -norm feature selection based on augmented and penalized minimization.基于增广和惩罚最小化的高效 ℓ -范数特征选择。
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 10;37(3):473-486. doi: 10.1002/sim.7526. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
2
A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.一种解决奥卡姆剃刀问题的贝叶斯区间剂量探索设计:mTPI-2。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;58:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Dose expansion cohorts in Phase I trials.I期试验中的剂量扩展队列。
Stat Biopharm Res. 2016;8(2):161-170. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2015.1135185. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.基于毒性概率区间的设计与连续重新评估方法的性能对比。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):291-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.7043. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
Rendering the 3 + 3 Design to Rest: More Efficient Approaches to Oncology Dose-Finding Trials in the Era of Targeted Therapy.将 3 + 3 设计搁置:在靶向治疗时代,更有效的肿瘤学剂量发现试验方法。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 1;22(11):2623-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2644.
6
Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.两阶段连续重新评估方法相对于最佳基准的性能。
Clin Trials. 2013;10(6):862-75. doi: 10.1177/1740774513503521. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
7
Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.改良毒性概率区间设计:比 3+3 设计更安全、更可靠的实用 I 期临床试验方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1785-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.7903. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
8
Small-sample behavior of novel phase I cancer trial designs.新型 I 期癌症试验设计的小样本行为。
Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):63-80. doi: 10.1177/1740774512469311.
9
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.基于坐标下降法的广义线性模型正则化路径
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22.
10
Model calibration in the continual reassessment method.序贯评估法中的模型校准
Clin Trials. 2009 Jun;6(3):227-38. doi: 10.1177/1740774509105076.