Department of Neurology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, WA; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, WA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, WA.
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, WA.
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):619-633. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has severely affected ICUs and critical care health-care providers (HCPs) worldwide.
How do regional differences and perceived lack of ICU resources affect critical care resource use and the well-being of HCPs?
Between April 23 and May 7, 2020, we electronically administered a 41-question survey to interdisciplinary HCPs caring for patients critically ill with COVID-19. The survey was distributed via critical care societies, research networks, personal contacts, and social media portals. Responses were tabulated according to World Bank region. We performed multivariate log-binomial regression to assess factors associated with three main outcomes: limiting mechanical ventilation (MV), changes in CPR practices, and emotional distress and burnout.
We included 2,700 respondents from 77 countries, including physicians (41%), nurses (40%), respiratory therapists (11%), and advanced practice providers (8%). The reported lack of ICU nurses was higher than that of intensivists (32% vs 15%). Limiting MV for patients with COVID-19 was reported by 16% of respondents, was lowest in North America (10%), and was associated with reduced ventilator availability (absolute risk reduction [ARR], 2.10; 95% CI, 1.61-2.74). Overall, 66% of respondents reported changes in CPR practices. Emotional distress or burnout was high across regions (52%, highest in North America) and associated with being female (mechanical ventilation, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33), being a nurse (ARR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.53), reporting a shortage of ICU nurses (ARR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.33), reporting a shortage of powered air-purifying respirators (ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.09-1.55), and experiencing poor communication from supervisors (ARR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.16-1.46).
Our findings demonstrate variability in ICU resource availability and use worldwide. The high prevalence of provider burnout and its association with reported insufficient resources and poor communication from supervisors suggest a need for targeted interventions to support HCPs on the front lines.
2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行严重影响了全球的 ICU 和重症监护医疗保健提供者(HCP)。
区域差异和认为缺乏 ICU 资源如何影响重症监护资源的使用和 HCP 的健康?
2020 年 4 月 23 日至 5 月 7 日,我们通过电子方式向照顾 COVID-19 重症患者的跨学科 HCP 发放了一份包含 41 个问题的调查。该调查通过重症监护学会、研究网络、个人联系和社交媒体门户分发。根据世界银行的区域对回复进行了分类。我们进行了多变量对数二项式回归,以评估与三个主要结果相关的因素:限制机械通气(MV)、心肺复苏术实践的变化以及情绪困扰和倦怠。
我们从 77 个国家/地区共纳入了 2700 名应答者,包括医生(41%)、护士(40%)、呼吸治疗师(11%)和高级实践提供者(8%)。报告的 ICU 护士短缺情况比重症监护医师更为严重(32%比 15%)。有 16%的应答者报告限制了 COVID-19 患者的 MV,北美地区的比例最低(10%),并且与呼吸机可用性降低有关(绝对风险降低[ARR],2.10;95%CI,1.61-2.74)。总体而言,66%的应答者报告心肺复苏术实践发生了变化。情绪困扰或倦怠在各个地区都很高(52%,在北美最高),并且与女性(机械通气,1.16;95%CI,1.01-1.33)、护士(ARR,1.31;95%CI,1.13-1.53)、报告 ICU 护士短缺(ARR,1.18;95%CI,1.05-1.33)、报告缺乏动力空气净化呼吸器(ARR,1.30;95%CI,1.09-1.55)以及从主管那里获得的沟通不良(ARR,1.30;95%CI,1.16-1.46)有关。
我们的研究结果表明,全球 ICU 资源的可用性和使用情况存在差异。提供者倦怠的高患病率及其与报告的资源不足和主管沟通不畅之间的关联表明,需要针对前线的 HCP 进行有针对性的干预。