Muss H B, Wells H B, Paschold E H, Black W R, Cooper M R, Capizzi R L, Christian R, Cruz J M, Jackson D V, Powell B L
Oncology Research Center, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27103.
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jul;6(7):1098-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.7.1098.
One hundred thirty-eight patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive megestrol acetate 40 mg orally four times daily or tamoxifen 10 mg orally twice a day. Upon treatment failure patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment. Eligibility required that either the estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) be positive or that both values be unknown, and that the patients be at least 2 years post-spontaneous menopause or over 50 years of age. Pretreatment characteristics including performance status (PS), disease-free interval (DFI), receptor status, and prior treatment were similar for both groups. Only three patients had previous hormonal therapy while one third had prior chemotherapy. Objective response was determined using strict International Union Against Cancer (UICC) criteria. Seventeen of 61 patients achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on megestrol (28%) while 20 of 64 patients achieved CR or PR on tamoxifen (31%). Responses of skin and bone lesions were similar for both agents; however, more patients with visceral disease responded to tamoxifen. Response did not correlate with the level of ER or PR but was correlated with age. Both unadjusted and adjusted analysis of time to progression and adjusted analysis (for pretreatment variables) of survival showed significant differences favoring tamoxifen. Six of 44 patients (14%) crossed from megestrol to tamoxifen achieved CR or PR while only two of 38 patients (5%) crossed from tamoxifen to megestrol achieved response. Only one of the original patients randomized to megestrol remains on study, while 12 patients still remain on tamoxifen. These data indicate similar response rates for megestrol and tamoxifen; however, time to progression and overall survival significantly favor tamoxifen when used as first-line therapy in this trial.
138例复发或转移性乳腺癌患者被随机分为两组,一组口服醋酸甲地孕酮40毫克,每日4次;另一组口服他莫昔芬10毫克,每日2次。治疗失败后,患者交叉接受替代治疗。入选标准要求雌激素受体(ER)或孕激素受体(PR)呈阳性,或两者情况均未知,且患者自自然绝经后至少2年或年龄超过50岁。两组患者的预处理特征,包括体能状态(PS)、无病间期(DFI)、受体状态和既往治疗情况相似。只有3例患者曾接受过激素治疗,而三分之一的患者曾接受过化疗。客观缓解情况根据严格的国际抗癌联盟(UICC)标准确定。61例接受甲地孕酮治疗的患者中有17例达到完全缓解(CR)或部分缓解(PR)(28%),而64例接受他莫昔芬治疗的患者中有20例达到CR或PR(31%)。两种药物对皮肤和骨病变的缓解情况相似;然而,更多内脏疾病患者对他莫昔芬有反应。缓解情况与ER或PR水平无关,但与年龄相关。对进展时间的未调整和调整分析以及对生存情况的调整分析(针对预处理变量)均显示,他莫昔芬具有显著优势。从甲地孕酮交叉至他莫昔芬治疗的44例患者中有6例(14%)达到CR或PR,而从他莫昔芬交叉至甲地孕酮治疗的38例患者中只有2例(5%)有反应。最初随机接受甲地孕酮治疗的患者中只有1例仍在研究中,而仍有12例患者在接受他莫昔芬治疗。这些数据表明甲地孕酮和他莫昔芬的缓解率相似;然而,在本试验中作为一线治疗时,他莫昔芬在进展时间和总生存期方面具有显著优势。