Bonomi P, Gale M, Von Roenn J, Anderson K, Johnson P, Wolter J, Economou S
Rush University, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60612.
Semin Oncol. 1988 Apr;15(2 Suppl 1):26-33.
Estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels have been reported to have prognostic significance with respect to disease-free survival in early-stage breast cancer patients. The current retrospective study was undertaken to determine whether ER and PgR levels, as well as other potential prognostic factors, might be related to a progression-free interval (PFI) during additive hormonal therapy in advanced-stage breast cancer patients. Eligibility requirements for this study included the following: histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, known quantitative ER and PgR levels, postmenopausal status, treatment with either megestrol acetate or tamoxifen, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status less than or equal to 2. The characteristics of the 105 patients included in these analyses were as follows: median age, 62 years; median disease-free interval (DFI), 523 days; median ER level, 44 fmol/mg; median PgR level, 52 fmol/mg; soft tissue-dominant disease, 37 patients (35%); bone-dominant disease, 36 patients (34%); visceral-dominant disease, 32 patients (31%); one site of disease, 60 patients (58%); two or more sites of disease, 45 patients (42%); treatment with megestrol acetate, 62 patients (59%); treatment with tamoxifen, 43 patients (41%). All of the independent variables listed immediately above were included in a multiple linear regression analysis in which PFI, expressed as log PFI, was the dependent variable. In this analysis, a positive linear relationship was observed between log PFI and the following independent variables: log ER, log PgR, and age (r2 = 0.329). An alternative model (r2 = 0.350) was derived, in which previous treatment with chemotherapy was negatively related to log PFI. However, it appears that previous treatment with chemotherapy could be a "proxy variable," because patients who had been treated with chemotherapy previously were significantly younger and had significantly lower ER (P = 0.0001) and PgR levels (P = 0.0004). None of the other independent variables were included in these models. If the assumption that PFI is a measure of the effectiveness of hormonal therapy is true, these results suggest that quantitative ER and PgR levels and age supersede other traditional predictor variables in predicting the hormonal responsiveness of individual breast carcinoma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
据报道,雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PgR)水平对早期乳腺癌患者的无病生存期具有预后意义。本项回顾性研究旨在确定ER和PgR水平以及其他潜在的预后因素是否可能与晚期乳腺癌患者接受辅助激素治疗期间的无进展生存期(PFI)相关。本研究的入选标准如下:组织学确诊的复发性或转移性乳腺癌、已知的ER和PgR定量水平、绝经后状态、接受醋酸甲地孕酮或他莫昔芬治疗、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态小于或等于2。纳入这些分析的105例患者的特征如下:中位年龄62岁;中位无病间期(DFI)523天;中位ER水平44 fmol/mg;中位PgR水平52 fmol/mg;以软组织为主的疾病,37例患者(35%);以骨为主的疾病,36例患者(34%);以内脏为主的疾病,32例患者(31%);单一部位疾病,60例患者(58%);两个或更多部位疾病,45例患者(42%);接受醋酸甲地孕酮治疗,62例患者(59%);接受他莫昔芬治疗,43例患者(41%)。上述所有自变量均纳入多元线性回归分析,其中以log PFI表示的PFI为因变量。在该分析中,观察到log PFI与以下自变量之间存在正线性关系:log ER、log PgR和年龄(r2 = 0.329)。得出了另一个模型(r2 = 0.350),其中既往化疗与log PFI呈负相关。然而,既往化疗似乎可能是一个“替代变量”,因为既往接受化疗的患者明显更年轻,且ER(P = 0.0001)和PgR水平明显更低(P = 0.0004)。这些模型中未纳入其他自变量。如果PFI是激素治疗有效性指标这一假设成立,这些结果表明,ER和PgR定量水平以及年龄在预测个体乳腺癌的激素反应性方面优于其他传统预测变量。(摘要截断于400字)