Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Oct;17(7):828-832. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1818136. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the novel lateral transfer assist robot facilitates easier transfers compared with a wheelchair in post-stroke hemiparesis patients.
This cross-sectional study enrolled 20 post-stroke hemiparesis patients, and the task difficulty of transfers was compared between a wheelchair and lateral transfer assist robot. All participants were asked to transfer from either wheelchair or lateral transfer assist robot to a platform table and back. The primary outcome was the transfer score of the Functional Independence Measure. The secondary outcome was the time required for transfer.
The transfer score of the Functional Independence Measure was significantly higher with lateral transfer assist robot than with wheelchair ( < .001). The transfer times from these devices to a platform table and back showed no significant differences (to device from platform table: 7.8 s, lateral transfer assist robot vs 7.6 s, wheelchair, > .05: device to platform table: 7.1 s, lateral transfer assist robot vs 8.0 s, wheelchair, > .05).
Transfer with a lateral transfer assist robot is easier than with wheelchair and facilitates independence in post-stroke hemiparesis patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTransfer skill influences the functional independence and quality of life of a wheelchair userA novel structural mobility device-the lateral transfer assist robot (LTAR)-can facilitate transfersThe LTAR could improve the degree of independence for transfers than the wheelchair, without any time loss, in post-stroke hemiparesis patientsThe LTAR could potentially reduce the risk for falls in various medical and care facilities.
本研究旨在阐明新型横向转移辅助机器人是否比轮椅更便于脑卒中偏瘫患者转移。
本横断面研究纳入了 20 例脑卒中偏瘫患者,并比较了轮椅和横向转移辅助机器人转移的难度。所有参与者均被要求从轮椅或横向转移辅助机器人转移到平台表上,然后再返回。主要结果是功能性独立测量的转移评分。次要结果是转移所需的时间。
横向转移辅助机器人的功能性独立测量转移评分明显高于轮椅(<0.001)。从这些设备到平台表的转移时间没有显著差异(从设备到平台表:7.8s,横向转移辅助机器人与 7.6s,轮椅,>0.05:从设备到平台表:7.1s,横向转移辅助机器人与 8.0s,轮椅,>0.05)。
与轮椅相比,横向转移辅助机器人的转移更容易,并且可以促进脑卒中偏瘫患者的独立性。
转移技能影响轮椅使用者的功能独立性和生活质量。
新型结构移动设备——横向转移辅助机器人(LTAR)——可以促进转移。
LTAR 可以在不浪费任何时间的情况下,比轮椅更能提高脑卒中偏瘫患者的转移独立性。
LTAR 可能会降低在各种医疗和护理场所跌倒的风险。