Suppr超能文献

广泛的跨上皮采样联合活检可提高 Barrett 食管和食管异型增生的绝对检出率:荟萃分析和系统评价。

Wide-area transepithelial sampling in adjunct to forceps biopsy increases the absolute detection rates of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal dysplasia: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA

Department of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000494.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS) is a new technique that uses an abrasive brush to obtain samples from a larger surface area of the oesophagus. Studies have shown promising results that WATS in adjunct to forceps biopsy (FB) increases the detection rate of Barrett's oesophagus (BE) as well as oesophageal dysplasia (ED). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the detection rates of BE and ED between FB and WATS in adjunct to FB.

METHODS

A Literature search was done using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane and CINAHL from inception to 26 April 2020. A meta-analysis comparing detection rates of WATS in adjunct to FB versus FB using the random-effects model was done using RevMan V.5.3.

RESULTS

Pooled data from 20 392 endoscopies across 11 studies showed an absolute increase in detection of 16% (95% CI 0.10% to 0.22%, p<0.00001). A relative increase of 1.62 was seen in detection rates of BE (95% CI 1.28 to 2.05, p<0.0001) when WATS was used with FB with the number needed to test (NNT) of 6.1 patients. For ED, a 2% absolute increase (95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p=0.001) in additional diagnostic yield from WATS. A relative increase of 2.05 was seen in the detection rate of ED (95% CI 1.42 to 2.98, p=0.0001) yielding an NNT of 50 patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that WATS, as an adjunct to FB, improves both the absolute detection rate and relative detection rate of both BE and ED as compared to FB alone.

摘要

背景

广域跨上皮采样(WATS)是一种新的技术,它使用磨蚀刷从食管的更大表面积获取样本。研究表明,WATS 联合活检钳(FB)增加了 Barrett 食管(BE)和食管发育不良(ED)的检出率,结果很有前景。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了 FB 联合 WATS 与 FB 单独检查时 BE 和 ED 的检出率。

方法

从 2020 年 4 月 26 日起,通过电子数据库(包括 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 和 CINAHL)进行文献检索。使用 RevMan V.5.3 对使用随机效应模型比较 FB 联合 WATS 与 FB 检查时 WATS 检出率的荟萃分析数据进行汇总。

结果

来自 11 项研究的 20392 例内镜检查的汇总数据显示,BE 检出率绝对增加了 16%(95%CI 0.10%至 0.22%,p<0.00001)。与 FB 单独检查相比,WATS 联合 FB 检查时 BE 的检出率相对增加了 1.62(95%CI 1.28 至 2.05,p<0.0001),需要检查的患者数(NNT)为 6.1 例。对于 ED,WATS 可使诊断增益增加 2%(95%CI 0.01 至 0.03,p=0.001)。ED 的检出率相对增加了 2.05(95%CI 1.42 至 2.98,p=0.0001),NNT 为 50 例。

结论

我们的研究表明,与 FB 单独检查相比,WATS 联合 FB 可提高 BE 和 ED 的绝对检出率和相对检出率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5259/7488841/d1837b227d68/bmjgast-2020-000494f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验