Giannakou Ioanna, Gaskell Lynne
School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Mar;19(1):67-83. doi: 10.1002/msc.1511. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
A review of qualitative studies exploring Pilates-trained physiotherapists and their patients' perspectives and experiences of Pilates, aiming to improve practice and provide a deeper insight into the way this method is being utilized along with its effects on participants.
Qualitative evidence synthesis using meta-ethnography.
A comprehensive search strategy, limited to English language articles, was conducted to MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Cochrane Central for the period of January 2000 (inception) to June 2020. This was supplemented by identification of Grey literature through Google Scholar, website searching and reference lists.
Qualitative studies reporting experiences and perceptions of patients' or Pilates-trained physiotherapists' regarding the efficacy of Pilates for the management of chronic musculoskeletal conditions. After a process of exclusion, eight studies were included in the synthesis.
The textual data were analysed by a qualitative software program. Studies were critically appraised independently by two reviewers.
Articles were synthesized using a technique of meta-ethnography. Three themes emerged from the process of reciprocal translation: (1) Benefits of the Pilates approach; (2) most effective ways to utilize and most beneficial parameters and (3) risks, precautions, contraindications and indications.
This is the first qualitative evidence synthesis of practitioners' and patients' perspectives of Pilates. Findings support evidence for the various benefits of this approach and provide fresh insight into the way this method can be practiced to maximize efficiency and focus on the patients' needs.
Pilates-trained physiotherapists identified that Pilates can be tailored to individual requirements, preferences and needs, to promote self-management to facilitate clinical and cost-effective care.
回顾定性研究,探讨接受普拉提培训的物理治疗师及其患者对普拉提的看法和体验,旨在改进实践,并更深入地了解该方法的使用方式及其对参与者的影响。
采用元民族志的定性证据综合分析。
对2000年1月(起始时间)至2020年6月期间的MEDLINE(PubMed)、EMBASE、CINAHL、PEDro和Cochrane Central进行了全面的检索策略,仅限于英文文章。通过谷歌学术、网站搜索和参考文献列表对灰色文献进行识别,作为补充。
定性研究报告患者或接受普拉提培训的物理治疗师对普拉提治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疾病疗效的体验和看法。经过排除过程,八项研究被纳入综合分析。
文本数据由定性软件程序进行分析。两项评审员独立对研究进行严格评估。
使用元民族志技术对文章进行综合分析。在相互翻译过程中出现了三个主题:(1)普拉提方法的益处;(2)最有效的使用方式和最有益的参数;(3)风险、预防措施、禁忌症和适应症。
这是首次对从业者和患者对普拉提的看法进行定性证据综合分析。研究结果支持了该方法各种益处的证据,并为如何实践该方法以提高效率和关注患者需求提供了新的见解。
接受普拉提培训的物理治疗师认为,普拉提可以根据个人要求、偏好和需求进行调整,以促进自我管理,从而实现临床和成本效益高的护理。